Removal of airbox snorkle-BIG MPG! UPDATE 4.0!
Originally Posted by thetoaster
thats funny, in all my years in building cars, the whole idea is to keep the intake temp as low as possible and the exhaust temp as high as possible. i.e. intercoolers and heat wrap the headers. i dont see how hot air can do anything for your motor other than rob hp. jmo
Warm air = more MPG
Cold air = more HP.
Originally Posted by thetoaster
i didnt miss anything, if you are that hell bent on mpg get a prius or better yet duct the intake right off the header 
Originally Posted by pooder
Originally Posted by thetoaster
i didnt miss anything, if you are that hell bent on mpg get a prius or better yet duct the intake right off the header 
According to my calculations, that would buy a $&!%LOAD of gas!
here is a auction for a cheap $ going K&N drop in:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/K-N-A...spagenameZWDVW
I'm thinking about doing this snorkle design trick, but probably using a TRD drop-in.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/K-N-A...spagenameZWDVW
I'm thinking about doing this snorkle design trick, but probably using a TRD drop-in.
Senior Member



Music City Scions
SL Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,808
From: West TN - Land of twisty roads
Originally Posted by BoxOffice
Originally Posted by pooder
Originally Posted by thetoaster
i didnt miss anything, if you are that hell bent on mpg get a prius or better yet duct the intake right off the header 
According to my calculations, that would buy a $&!%LOAD of gas!
That used K&N filter ebay thing is funny. With shipping it's the same price as a new one!
Alright me being a previous mustang guy I can relate to these kind of experiments. I think mustang owners have put together some of the Weirdest/most effecient/least effecient CAI/RAI out there. Next weekend when I have time I am going to remove the lower snorkel and add a K&N air filter to it and I will let you all know the results. By then I will be passed 5k miles and hopefully my engine will have finished it's breaking in period.
Originally Posted by TheUglyOne
Alright me being a previous mustang guy I can relate to these kind of experiments. I think mustang owners have put together some of the Weirdest/most effecient/least effecient CAI/RAI out there. Next weekend when I have time I am going to remove the lower snorkel and add a K&N air filter to it and I will let you all know the results. By then I will be passed 5k miles and hopefully my engine will have finished it's breaking in period.
Originally Posted by dz302
I figure it can't hurt to take off the snorkel. If nothing else it cleans the engine compartment up a bit !!!
I tried it early on. I am mixed on it myself. At the same time I put mobile 1 in my manual tranny, so may not be a good test. I will say it did go up 1mpg, but my interstate use is mixed with traffic and accidents. I think on gas savers . org the better idea is to take it off the exhaust manifold and or plug in a dummy value into the oxygen or temp sensor so it runs leaner than normal.
I have the stock filter as it seems fairly free flowing and the modified one aint cheap.
I have the stock filter as it seems fairly free flowing and the modified one aint cheap.
Originally Posted by thetoaster
i didnt miss anything, if you are that hell bent on mpg get a prius or better yet duct the intake right off the header 
This is an xB thread, not a Prius thread.
This is about increasing the mPG for the box, not the most fuel efficient car.
As mentioned, 10-15K more would buy enough fuel for the lifetime of my box.
You missed the title of this thread....again.
Some other points were mentioned as well.
If you reread what you wrote, you went into a rant about robbing HP from your motor w/ warmer air. Totally had nothing to do with the thread dude.
Originally Posted by HeathenBrewing
Originally Posted by thetoaster
i didnt miss anything, if you are that hell bent on mpg get a prius or better yet duct the intake right off the header 
This is an xB thread, not a Prius thread.
This is about increasing the mPG for the box, not the most fuel efficient car.
As mentioned, 10-15K more would buy enough fuel for the lifetime of my box.
You missed the title of this thread....again.
Some other points were mentioned as well.
If you reread what you wrote, you went into a rant about robbing HP from your motor w/ warmer air. Totally had nothing to do with the thread dude.
I did this mod today, with a drop in TRD filter, reset the ECU, then right after I went to Chevron and filled my tank w/ 87 octane. I did not notice much of a engine noise change from before- maybe slight.
I'll check back with my results. I am using 16"X7 alloys(approx. 15 lbs each, about 4 pounds less then stock) , w/ 205-50-16" tires(about 2-3 pounds heavier then stock) , and nice lightweight lug nuts( 3.8 onces per wheel .. less then stock) - so theres that element. I drive a 5-speed 2006(last date produced) xA. I'll make sure my air pressure is proper(need to invest in a nice pressure guage) , the tires were last checked about 2 weeks ago, I'll check them again in about a week.
BoxOffice , I hope some of your good Scion vibes rub off on my Scion. It would be dope if I can get 5-6 more MPG's per gallon... that would be like saving $4 per tank of gas- or its basically like adding an extra gallon to our smaller gas tanks!!!!
I'll check back with my results. I am using 16"X7 alloys(approx. 15 lbs each, about 4 pounds less then stock) , w/ 205-50-16" tires(about 2-3 pounds heavier then stock) , and nice lightweight lug nuts( 3.8 onces per wheel .. less then stock) - so theres that element. I drive a 5-speed 2006(last date produced) xA. I'll make sure my air pressure is proper(need to invest in a nice pressure guage) , the tires were last checked about 2 weeks ago, I'll check them again in about a week.
BoxOffice , I hope some of your good Scion vibes rub off on my Scion. It would be dope if I can get 5-6 more MPG's per gallon... that would be like saving $4 per tank of gas- or its basically like adding an extra gallon to our smaller gas tanks!!!!
Originally Posted by Super-Stormtrooper07
... with a drop in TRD filter, reset the ECU...
Originally Posted by Super-Stormtrooper07
I did this mod today, with a drop in TRD filter, reset the ECU, then right after I went to Chevron and filled my tank w/ 87 octane. I did not notice much of a engine noise change from before- maybe slight.
I'll check back with my results. I am using 16"X7 alloys(approx. 15 lbs each, about 4 pounds less then stock) , w/ 205-50-16" tires(about 2-3 pounds heavier then stock) , and nice lightweight lug nuts( 3.8 onces per wheel .. less then stock) - so theres that element. I drive a 5-speed 2006(last date produced) xA. I'll make sure my air pressure is proper(need to invest in a nice pressure guage) , the tires were last checked about 2 weeks ago, I'll check them again in about a week.
BoxOffice , I hope some of your good Scion vibes rub off on my Scion. It would be dope if I can get 5-6 more MPG's per gallon... that would be like saving $4 per tank of gas- or its basically like adding an extra gallon to our smaller gas tanks!!!!

I'll check back with my results. I am using 16"X7 alloys(approx. 15 lbs each, about 4 pounds less then stock) , w/ 205-50-16" tires(about 2-3 pounds heavier then stock) , and nice lightweight lug nuts( 3.8 onces per wheel .. less then stock) - so theres that element. I drive a 5-speed 2006(last date produced) xA. I'll make sure my air pressure is proper(need to invest in a nice pressure guage) , the tires were last checked about 2 weeks ago, I'll check them again in about a week.
BoxOffice , I hope some of your good Scion vibes rub off on my Scion. It would be dope if I can get 5-6 more MPG's per gallon... that would be like saving $4 per tank of gas- or its basically like adding an extra gallon to our smaller gas tanks!!!!
Keep in mind that it seems like quite a few people haven't gotten much in the way of results for a tank or two (why, I don't know, other than the possible ECU re-set), so don't be disappointed if things don't improve right away.
Speaking of which, I just got the best tank I've had in a while - constant A/C has been killing my mileage.
All city driving, plenty of A/C use, but drove pretty carefully for the whole tank = 390 miles!
That worked out to a decent 37.65 mpg!
Can't wait for fall and cooler weather (no A/C!).
All city driving, plenty of A/C use, but drove pretty carefully for the whole tank = 390 miles!
That worked out to a decent 37.65 mpg!
Can't wait for fall and cooler weather (no A/C!).
Originally Posted by Super-Stormtrooper07
I am using 16"X7 alloys(approx. 15 lbs each, about 4 pounds less then stock) , w/ 205-50-16" tires(about 2-3 pounds heavier then stock) , and nice lightweight lug nuts( 3.8 onces per wheel .. less then stock) - so theres that element.
Unfortunately your tires are heavier and since they are the farthest out from the hub, they become the most consequential weight on your whole wheel/tire package.



