Notices
Scion xB 1st-Gen Owners Lounge
First Generation 2004-2006.5 [NCP31]

xB = Slowest, non-hybrid car on the market?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2006 | 09:19 AM
  #41  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

highlander with the 2.4

camry with the 2.4


there is no way the echo is faster. the scion xb's manual versus an echo manual. the horrendous gear ratios in the echo suck total ****.
Old Oct 7, 2006 | 09:20 AM
  #42  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

Originally Posted by OldYeller
Originally Posted by v1_Rotate
Originally Posted by black_sand_box
The Echo has got to be slower!
Isn't the xB based on the Echo. And considering the xB probably weighs more, I would say it's quite possible the xB is slower.

As for the the questions stated in this thread, the xB is among the slowest stock cars for sale right now. It has to be, because it is SLOW (but getting 30mpg is all good for me).
Echo a couple hundred pounds lighter and better aerodynamics with same engine---got to be faster.
it as horrendous gearing . auto to auto the eco's/yaris are faster . manual to manual the xB's zippy greas kill the eco/yaris
Old Oct 7, 2006 | 02:55 PM
  #43  
TheRealBoxster's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 315
Default

3rd class driving sure beats first class walking!!
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 10:43 PM
  #44  
whitesuperbox's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 65
Default

After having the car for less than a month, all people ask me is, "so the car is pretty slow, huh?" Well, regardless of how fast it can accelerate, I'm consistently passing people on the road. And the engine's not broken in so I don't drive it hard and rarely push it past 4500rpm. Getting to the destination on time and getting 30mpg....that's sweet
Old Oct 9, 2006 | 11:28 PM
  #45  
TheScionicMan's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,736
From: In the Hot Tub
Default

When I was at the track, the Prius was beating me by almost half a second. I've got an auto with several bolt-ons and light wheels and I could only break under 18 seconds twice out of 18 runs. But you better be on your toes if you plan to leave me at the light...
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 03:52 AM
  #46  
kevets's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 232
From: NoVA
Default

Originally Posted by hotbox05
a ha ha . umm yeah in a vette. yea , um NO.

motorswap should get me into high 13's. just gotta save up and then start collecting tons and tons of parts and such. and 14's on street tires will make me pretty happy.
Alright, there is just something a bit scary to me about a car like the xB having some power. Won't it just roll like a dice game if it gets going to fast in a turn? btw I am loving the talk of engine swaps.. that sounds like some potentially great stuff.
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 05:16 AM
  #47  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

if you are at stock height with dead shocks yes. if you are lowered on stock shocks probably not , if you are dropped 4 inches up front and 3 inches out back on racing coilovers like I am ? HELL no. lol
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 02:32 PM
  #48  
tuvanhillbilly's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 163
From: Palmyra, VA
Default

I think the big difference here is manual vs auto. I've got a 2006 xb with the 5 speed, my wife has a 2006 xa with the automatic. Driving them is like night and day. The main difference is that I can control the engine revs with the manual. If I'm in the mood for some spirited driving, I'll keep the revs in the 4k range (especially fun on the twisties). The tall gearing in the auto just can't compete--I hate driving the wife's car.
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 05:13 PM
  #49  
TheScionicMan's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,736
From: In the Hot Tub
Default

It's not that big of a difference, IMO. I was less than a second slower than manual xBs with somewhat similar setups. I don't think any of the sticks were getting out of the 17s.
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 05:19 PM
  #50  
rvpps2rocks's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,661
From: Simi Valley, CA
Default

i know you said in stock form and i know i will probably get chewed out about this but. DROP A TURBO in the biznatch. im sure u could take some names then...ahahah
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 05:43 PM
  #51  
citizen01's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 940
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by hotbox05
if you are at stock height with dead shocks yes. if you are lowered on stock shocks probably not , if you are dropped 4 inches up front and 3 inches out back on racing coilovers like I am ? HELL no. lol
Wow engine swapping, etc... sounds like a lot of money. Maybe even enough to spring for a sports car as opposed to economy since apparently that's what you want.
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 05:47 PM
  #52  
TheScionicMan's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,736
From: In the Hot Tub
Default

It's not about going fast, it's about making THIS car go faster...
Old Oct 10, 2006 | 05:53 PM
  #53  
cherryBox's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scinergy
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,157
From: ScinergyCO
Default

Originally Posted by firesquare
Originally Posted by NotAllBad
If you're looking for speed, you got the wrong car.
i agree
+1
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 05:13 AM
  #54  
hotbox05's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 13,706
From: Sacramento, CA / Nor*Cal
Default

Originally Posted by citizen01
Originally Posted by hotbox05
if you are at stock height with dead shocks yes. if you are lowered on stock shocks probably not , if you are dropped 4 inches up front and 3 inches out back on racing coilovers like I am ? HELL no. lol
Wow engine swapping, etc... sounds like a lot of money. Maybe even enough to spring for a sports car as opposed to economy since apparently that's what you want.
it's a money pit like most cars are for most is not all car enthusiasts .

just trying to make this car the best it can possibly be. i still have motorcycles for speed.
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 05:43 AM
  #55  
13edge's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 818
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Originally Posted by hotbox05
it's a money pit like most cars are for most is not all car enthusiasts.

Never a truer statement. You know you're hooked on modding a car when you hang up the phone after ordering leopard print carpet for the roof of your Cadillac... the outside of the roof... so you can get that true pimp look. I miss that car...
Old Oct 11, 2006 | 11:59 PM
  #56  
PIMPmyPride's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 160
From: U.S.
Default

Just though I add one other car that is slower than the xB.

Old Oct 12, 2006 | 06:55 PM
  #57  
rvpps2rocks's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,661
From: Simi Valley, CA
Default

Flintstones?
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 08:38 PM
  #58  
PIMPmyPride's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 160
From: U.S.
Default

Hey, this car and boat it for sale too!
Just a measly $13,998.00 ! and it's all yours!. lol
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 02:27 AM
  #59  
koalaty2's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 595
From: Lancaster, CA
Default

Lets set the record straight right away for the 2008 models. If I remember correctly, 1st gen xB's, manual shift was in the high 9's 0-60, and auto in the mid 10's.
We are as fast as at least 30 new 2008's (I just listed the 10's and over) . Of course these would be times with the smallest engine selection. (We just didn't happen to have an engine choice)
Consumer Reports Apr 08 edition. Chevy Avalance 10.1, Aveo 11.7, Dodge Caliber 10.5, Grand Caravan 10.3, Ford Escape 10.5, Explorer SportTrac 10.6, Honda CR-V 10.6, Civic 10.1, Element 10.4, Fit 12.4, Hummer H3 11.5, Hyundai Accent 12.5, Elantra 10.4, Tucson 10.1, Jeep Compas 10.1, Patriot 10.8, Wrangler 10.7, Kia Rio 12.8, Spectra 11.4, Sportage 11.3, Mazda Tributo 10.5, Mazda5 10.3, Mercury Mariner 10.5, Nissan Versa 10.1, Sabaru Legacy/Outback 10.8, Forester 10.0, Forenza 11.3, SX-4 12.2, Toyota Prius 10.5, Yaris 11.4.
We are not slow, just not quick.
Old Mar 4, 2008 | 02:42 AM
  #60  
bB2NER's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 11,808
From: West TN - Land of twisty roads
Default

Yay, we aren't the slowest anymore. Who cares how fast we are when we roll with this much STYLE.



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:28 AM.