Notices
Scion xB 1st-Gen Owners Lounge
First Generation 2004-2006.5 [NCP31]

xb vs. element

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 25, 2005 | 09:49 PM
  #41  
killerxromances's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,808
Default

Originally Posted by Sciond
Originally Posted by killerxromances
Originally Posted by Biznox
My mistake. I was replying to someone else in an earlier post.

Either way, I guess I just don't personally think of it as a wagon and apparently no one in the federal government does either. I don't know of anyone who would look at the xB and say it was a wagon either.

I suspect many people who have xB's just loathe SUV's and minivans and would rather think they drive a wagon.

Like I said though, if the xB is a wagon, then anything with 4 doors and a hatch is a wagon. The Golf is a wagon, so is the 5 door Mazda3 and a bunch of other cars.

Traditionally what most people think of as a wagon, means at least 2 feet of room behind the rear seats--- not less space than the trunk in a sedan! Compare a Jetta wagon to a 4 door Golf, for example.

If you don't beleive me, try asking some other non-xB owners what they would consider the xB. I'd be amazed if the word "wagon" comes out of any of their mouths. You'll hear hatchback and van and even truck before you hear "wagon". That's been my experience.

Calling the xB a wagon is kind of like calling the tC a sportscar.

Wishful thinking, in other words...
I know quite a few xb owners that consider the xb a wagon, this was discussed over a year ago. Most insurance companies also list the xb under 5-door wagon, including mine. Insurance companies would consist in part of government due to the fact most of their laws are government standards as far as what they can ensure, how the list each car so on so forth.

I consider a truck something with a bed, the Xb phsyically is far from a truck. Hatchback i would agree with being that its a wagon, wagon's have hatches. Calling the xb a wagon is like calling a tC a sports-car? Please, the tC has no sports car like features as far as performance goes, where-as the xb has a ton of features that include it in the wagon catigory. And yes, i think the mazda3 hatch is a wagon.

The only bit of information you provided in arguement was the fact it doesn't have 1.5ft behind the rear seats. Since when does a foot a half declair wagon vs. hatch?

Cya
hmmmm ever see the magazine"Stylewagons"?
Yep.

Cya
Old Dec 25, 2005 | 09:54 PM
  #42  
killerxromances's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,808
Default

Originally Posted by Biznox
You consider the Mazda3 hatch a wagon?

Even Mazda doesn't try and pass it off as one...

That explains alot.

I guess we just aren't going to agree.

BTW insurance companies will call it whatever they have to so they can charge you more to insure it.

The government has actual size/dimensional criteria to decide what a vehicle is.
Actually, Xb would be more if they considered it a suv vs. wagon. Wagon's are one of the cheapest to ensure.

Also, a 5-door hatch can be considered a wagon, depending on a few things. Mazda3 is more of a hatch, but it has wagon like features. Xb is a wagon, i don't see how hard that is for you to understand. Even when i signed off on the xb my paper work said, "5-door wagon" on the toyota forums. Apparently they call it one as well. Either way, its design has many features based on many differen't cars however, i don't see how hard it would for anyone to understand the reasoning behind me, and anyone else saying its a wagon.

Cya
Old Dec 25, 2005 | 11:32 PM
  #43  
mikee1680's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 150
Default

There's no comparison between the two. Elements are ugly and expensive. I'd rather buy a crv than get an element. xb are great because of price. Leaves a lot of room for customization.
Old Dec 26, 2005 | 02:45 AM
  #44  
gslippy's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 134
Default

Car & Driver magazine just picked the xB as the #1 box.

#1: Scion xB
#2: Chrysler PT Cruiser
#3: Chevy HHR
#4: Honda Element

I'm mostly shocked by the Honda's rating in this comparison. I mean, beat by a Chevy?!

Ya gotta read the article!
Old Dec 26, 2005 | 03:54 AM
  #45  
ScionPsyche's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 65
From: Bellevue, WA
Default

The element has that black plastic cladding on the side - UGLY! It looks like Honda took their styling cues from the Pontiac Aztec or the Chevy Avalanche.

I admit that the Xb is no raving beauty but next to the Element it is.
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 08:14 PM
  #46  
Biznox's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 361
From: Delray Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by killerxromances
Originally Posted by Biznox
You consider the Mazda3 hatch a wagon?

Even Mazda doesn't try and pass it off as one...

That explains alot.

I guess we just aren't going to agree.

BTW insurance companies will call it whatever they have to so they can charge you more to insure it.

The government has actual size/dimensional criteria to decide what a vehicle is.
Actually, Xb would be more if they considered it a suv vs. wagon. Wagon's are one of the cheapest to ensure.

Also, a 5-door hatch can be considered a wagon, depending on a few things. Mazda3 is more of a hatch, but it has wagon like features. Xb is a wagon, i don't see how hard that is for you to understand. Even when i signed off on the xb my paper work said, "5-door wagon" on the toyota forums. Apparently they call it one as well. Either way, its design has many features based on many differen't cars however, i don't see how hard it would for anyone to understand the reasoning behind me, and anyone else saying its a wagon.

Cya
I guess I just don't consider something a wagon if it has less useable space behind the rear seats than a sedan with a trunk would. I can see why you might call it a wagon though since the back end is flat instead of arched downward.

If you look at *anything* that is SOLD as a wagon and called a wagon by the MANUFACTURER, you'll notice it has more than 6" depth behind the rear seats. That's what leads me to think that mine is the more commonly accepted definition.

I think EPA and DOT came up with the MPV designation for the xB based on the high roof and tiny, barely useful cargo area behind the rear seats.

Ask anyone what a wagon is and usually the first thing they'll think is a rear, glassed-in area with lots of room and a rear door instead of a trunk. Most people don't think of a wagon as something that barely fits two bags of groceries in the cargo area.
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 10:52 PM
  #47  
killerxromances's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,808
Default

Originally Posted by Biznox
Originally Posted by killerxromances
Originally Posted by Biznox
You consider the Mazda3 hatch a wagon?

Even Mazda doesn't try and pass it off as one...

That explains alot.

I guess we just aren't going to agree.

BTW insurance companies will call it whatever they have to so they can charge you more to insure it.

The government has actual size/dimensional criteria to decide what a vehicle is.
Actually, Xb would be more if they considered it a suv vs. wagon. Wagon's are one of the cheapest to ensure.

Also, a 5-door hatch can be considered a wagon, depending on a few things. Mazda3 is more of a hatch, but it has wagon like features. Xb is a wagon, i don't see how hard that is for you to understand. Even when i signed off on the xb my paper work said, "5-door wagon" on the toyota forums. Apparently they call it one as well. Either way, its design has many features based on many differen't cars however, i don't see how hard it would for anyone to understand the reasoning behind me, and anyone else saying its a wagon.

Cya
I guess I just don't consider something a wagon if it has less useable space behind the rear seats than a sedan with a trunk would. I can see why you might call it a wagon though since the back end is flat instead of arched downward.

If you look at *anything* that is SOLD as a wagon and called a wagon by the MANUFACTURER, you'll notice it has more than 6" depth behind the rear seats. That's what leads me to think that mine is the more commonly accepted definition.

I think EPA and DOT came up with the MPV designation for the xB based on the high roof and tiny, barely useful cargo area behind the rear seats.

Ask anyone what a wagon is and usually the first thing they'll think is a rear, glassed-in area with lots of room and a rear door instead of a trunk. Most people don't think of a wagon as something that barely fits two bags of groceries in the cargo area.
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 06:51 AM
  #48  
Biznox's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 361
From: Delray Beach, FL
Default



Old Dec 28, 2005 | 10:51 AM
  #49  
djct_watt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Default

Originally Posted by Biznox


Not that I'm taking sides, but that's just a hilarious reply!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAH

I'll add one of my own. . .
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MRE
Off-topic Cafe
3
Feb 16, 2016 11:26 PM
DannyBoy65
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
1
Sep 21, 2015 06:23 PM
ScionLife Editor
Scion News Forum
0
Sep 8, 2015 07:10 PM
Threequalseven
Scion xD Owner's Lounge
3
Aug 26, 2015 04:24 PM
marsman328
Regional - Pacific Mid
0
Jul 28, 2015 09:43 PM




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:22 PM.