Goodbye tC, hellooooo Si
#44
Here is all the information you would want to know on specifications. Not by edmonds... not by a 3rd party source but from Honda.
http://www.hondanews.com/CatID2015?m...58648&mime=asc
and as you can see. the tC still has shorter gears.
The RSX-S is clearly a better buy. weighs less, More hp, more torque.. and suprisingly cost about the same
http://www.hondanews.com/CatID3023?m...68070&mime=asc
06 Civic SI = teh suck. It does outperform the NA tC, but it doesn't out perform its big brother the RSX-S and cost the same. So hey g'head and get on the Vic Band Wagon. NA tC < 06 Vic SI < RSX-S (by performance)
Vic SI < RSX-S < NA tC (By bang for your buck) and the tC is below the 20k mark. NOW you wanna go with cars in the 20k+ range
Vic SI < RSX-S< Cobalt Supercharged < Neon SRT-4 (Suprisingly it goes the same for bang for your buck and performance.)
http://www.hondanews.com/CatID2015?m...58648&mime=asc
and as you can see. the tC still has shorter gears.
The RSX-S is clearly a better buy. weighs less, More hp, more torque.. and suprisingly cost about the same
http://www.hondanews.com/CatID3023?m...68070&mime=asc
06 Civic SI = teh suck. It does outperform the NA tC, but it doesn't out perform its big brother the RSX-S and cost the same. So hey g'head and get on the Vic Band Wagon. NA tC < 06 Vic SI < RSX-S (by performance)
Vic SI < RSX-S < NA tC (By bang for your buck) and the tC is below the 20k mark. NOW you wanna go with cars in the 20k+ range
Vic SI < RSX-S< Cobalt Supercharged < Neon SRT-4 (Suprisingly it goes the same for bang for your buck and performance.)
#46
Originally Posted by dslrdave
I like the SI swimsuit issue.
good luck with the new SI. the increase of weight in civic's in the last few years is sad. the low curb weight of the civic is what made them so appealing to me.
Soo.... you want to sell me your RS1.0 grill before you get the SI??? :D
#49
i say this is just weeding out the ricers from the people who choose to be different and apart of something bigger, A Scion Community.
thats what i think. maybe not what you think
so those who choose to switch to the "Darkside".....good luck and have fun with your deathstars!(figurativly speaking)
thats what i think. maybe not what you think
so those who choose to switch to the "Darkside".....good luck and have fun with your deathstars!(figurativly speaking)
#50
Senior Member
SoCal tC Club
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,947
06 civic si = k20a2 or shoud i say the 01-04 RSX type S
did any of you know this?
and do you know how powerful this engine is?
for all those who doubt this car.... all i can say is. ITS FAST!
anyways
haha i could be all fluff, bag of hot air, or talking outta my ___
i love my TC and thats that! :D
did any of you know this?
and do you know how powerful this engine is?
for all those who doubt this car.... all i can say is. ITS FAST!
anyways
haha i could be all fluff, bag of hot air, or talking outta my ___
i love my TC and thats that! :D
#52
Originally Posted by hahaitzskippy
06 civic si = k20a2 or shoud i say the 01-04 RSX type S
did any of you know this?
and do you know how powerful this engine is?
for all those who doubt this car.... all i can say is. ITS FAST!
anyways
haha i could be all fluff, bag of hot air, or talking outta my butt
i love my TC and thats that! :D
did any of you know this?
and do you know how powerful this engine is?
for all those who doubt this car.... all i can say is. ITS FAST!
anyways
haha i could be all fluff, bag of hot air, or talking outta my butt
i love my TC and thats that! :D
The engine is actually called the K20Z3. A major difference is that the Si engine has a balance shaft, so that the engine runs smoother throughout the powerband. Also, the engine has similar cams with the K20Z1, the 05-06 RSX-S engine.
Regardless, the 06 Si engine appears to be the best K series engine available in America.
#55
The B18C from the type r had 130 peak ft lbs @ 7000 rpm, which is less than the K20Z3. Also, considering that the 06 Si specs are rated with the new SAE standard, that means the Si engine fares even better. In terms of hp/liter, yeah the B18C is technically "better", but I would think a person like you would prefer the richer torque curve found in the Si engine.
Btw there is a better K series engine, but it's only for japan. Its the k20a for the type r integra (rsx) which has 220 ps.
Btw there is a better K series engine, but it's only for japan. Its the k20a for the type r integra (rsx) which has 220 ps.
#56
sux 2 think im sayin dis 2..but i got a rs1 wit lambos from the factory which was a huge part in my decision 2 buy the car. if not I probably wud hav never bought it belive it or not I was set on the 05 rsx-s or impreza ..and im really contemplatin whether or not 2 buy the new si even tho ive always drove and ownd toyota....if our cars even had gt-s motors and weighed less than the late model celica Id never sell it for a civic but at the moment I dont get my speed fix and I chose 2 just go for show with this car and save gas instead...wierd but man i heard the video clip on templeofvtec and that car sounds sick out the box i just dont like the front styling at all the tc is a way better looking car in my opinion and im sure its not going to be near as spacious
#57
sux 2 think im sayin dis 2..but i got a rs1 wit lambos from the factory which was a huge part in my decision 2 buy the car. if not I probably wud hav never bought it belive it or not I was set on the 05 rsx-s or impreza ..and im really contemplatin whether or not 2 buy the new si even tho ive always drove and ownd toyota....if our cars even had gt-s motors and weighed less than the late model celica Id never sell it for a civic but at the moment I dont get my speed fix and I chose 2 just go for show with this car and save gas instead...wierd but man i heard the video clip on templeofvtec and that car sounds sick out the box i just dont like the front styling at all the tc is a way better looking car in my opinion and im sure its not going to be near as spacious
#58
Originally Posted by LaMbO_tC
sux 2 think im sayin dis 2..but i got a rs1 wit lambos from the factory which was a huge part in my decision 2 buy the car. if not I probably wud hav never bought it belive it or not I was set on the 05 rsx-s or impreza ..and im really contemplatin whether or not 2 buy the new si even tho ive always drove and ownd toyota....if our cars even had gt-s motors and weighed less than the late model celica Id never sell it for a civic but at the moment I dont get my speed fix and I chose 2 just go for show with this car and save gas instead...wierd but man i heard the video clip on templeofvtec and that car sounds sick out the box i just dont like the front styling at all the tc is a way better looking car in my opinion and im sure its not going to be near as spacious
#59
Originally Posted by corey415
The B18C from the type r had 130 peak ft lbs @ 7000 rpm, which is less than the K20Z3. Also, considering that the 06 Si specs are rated with the new SAE standard, that means the Si engine fares even better. In terms of hp/liter, yeah the B18C is technically "better", but I would think a person like you would prefer the richer torque curve found in the Si engine.
Btw there is a better K series engine, but it's only for japan. Its the k20a for the type r integra (rsx) which has 220 ps.
Btw there is a better K series engine, but it's only for japan. Its the k20a for the type r integra (rsx) which has 220 ps.
#60
i aggree the type-r b18c5 is a great motor. but the k20a type-r is by far a better motor. I've read that a ported b18c5 head cannot flow as much cfm as a stock k20a type-r head........plus ive see a usdm type-s motor handle bolt-ons, and a 120 shot of nos to lay down 330ps to the wheels(stock internals). Toyota is a great manufacturer for motors.......the 4ag, the 3sgte, the 2jzgte.......for example.