Notices
Photography & Video A place to discuss and display cameras, equipment and photographs.

DSLR Owners Unite! (56k? Are you kidding me?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 08:58 PM
  #8201  
o8tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,131
From: Haterville aka Chicago
Default

just upgraded my flickr account to "pro" :D
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 09:20 PM
  #8202  
Murbyrne's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
MN Scions
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,725
From: The Land of 10,000 Lakes
Default

Old Jul 6, 2009 | 09:44 PM
  #8203  
goingcarcrazy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 337
Default

Originally Posted by kiss_kiss_kill
goingcarcrazy thats crazy lookin, what lens did you use?!
Thanks! For the downtown shot I used a 17-55 IS (speaking of IS, the IS on this sucker lets me handhold some crazy shots. This is one lens that IS helps dearly on.) and for the bug pic I used a 180L macro.
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 09:48 PM
  #8204  
GammaTNT's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,592
From: NJ
Default

the bug pic is awesome!!
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 11:19 PM
  #8205  
Elijahtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,489
From: Memphis,TN
Default

just got myself a new pitbull today. Here are a few really quick snaps of him. trying to come up with a name that is photorgaphy related. Don suggested ANSEL, from Ansel Adams which is prolly the best and most well known photographer of all times especially in the b/w world.







Old Jul 6, 2009 | 11:22 PM
  #8206  
RA042726's Avatar
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Scikotics
SL Member
MN Scions
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 995
Default

^CUTE!!

I like him. and the name ansel
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 11:23 PM
  #8207  
goingcarcrazy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 337
Default

Heck just call him 1ds3. that'll get people asking questions. But you're right, Ansel would be a good name, especially since he IS black and white...
Old Jul 6, 2009 | 11:33 PM
  #8208  
Elijahtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,489
From: Memphis,TN
Default

yeah it just doesn't seem to roll off the tongue right...ha ha
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 12:55 AM
  #8209  
Jon's Avatar
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,124
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

^Love the 2nd one, Elijah.

Old Jul 7, 2009 | 12:58 AM
  #8210  
Elijahtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,489
From: Memphis,TN
Default

Thanks Jon. There is one I really like but there is a blade of grass that goes across his eye that kills the shot.
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 01:20 AM
  #8211  
snowromance's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,192
Default

some recents.... from about 20,000ft



this is wicked to do
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 06:36 AM
  #8212  
B_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 487
From: Tracy, CA
Default

^^amazing!
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 07:38 PM
  #8213  
Zillon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,976
From: Southeast PA
Default

Originally Posted by DonNguyen
Originally Posted by Zillon
Originally Posted by Elijahtc
I have the 70-200 f4 L USM and love it. I am more than confident on hand holding it. Just bump up ur ISO if ur having problems instead of paying so damn much for the IS feature that u will hardly use. I have 2 lenses that have IS and I don't use it on either one of them.
Sorry, but if you have the money to afford the IS feature, get the IS lens, especially on the longer focal lengths.

I've been in situations where the IS was invaluable to me, as image quality was absolutely paramount since I was getting paid for the images I captured.

Increasing ISO to get more usability in low light is no substitute for IS.
forget IS....

I've been shooting sports and concerts for years and have NEVER used IS
Well, I don't think IS is necessary for shooting sports or concerts, personally.

Stills, on the other hand, is where IS shines.

If you have extremely steady hands, then go right ahead, forget the IS. I however, do not. Thus, I find IS to be something that comes in handy.
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 07:40 PM
  #8214  
Elijahtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,489
From: Memphis,TN
Default

u think Ansel Adams ever even had the choice for IS?
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 08:04 PM
  #8215  
Zillon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,976
From: Southeast PA
Default

Originally Posted by Elijahtc
u think Ansel Adams ever even had the choice for IS?


Do you know anything about how Ansel Adams captured his images? They weren't hand-held compositions.

IS comes in handy for hand-held photos.

Look up f/64.
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 08:07 PM
  #8216  
Elijahtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,489
From: Memphis,TN
Default

dude do u have seizures or something? if ur in that low of light that u need that much help then y not use a flash, tripod, monopod, or boost ISO?
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 08:12 PM
  #8217  
Zillon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,976
From: Southeast PA
Default

Boosting ISO results in unwanted noise.

Tripods are bulky, and can't always be used in tight spaces.

Flashes... depends on what kind of look you're going for. I prefer natural lighting. Every once in a while I use a flash, but it's not really my preference.

A monopod is still on my list, though. Something I've been meaning to pick up for a while.
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 08:16 PM
  #8218  
NYNCTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,458
From: CYN
Default

i love arguments. sometimes noise isnt bad. at a concert, i wouldnt mind seeing a bit of noise in the photo to give it some feel, but somewhere else, not so much.
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #8219  
Elijahtc's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,489
From: Memphis,TN
Default

if u have a flash u can modify the light to look natural, especially if u have a 430 or 580 that shoots with ETTL.

and a monopod could work even in tight spaces and is height adjustable.

and boosting the ISO shouldn't cause that much noise. Most cameras now days can handle high ISO's with minimal effects.

and that's just another reason FILM is better than digital....GRAIN is sexier than NOISE ha ha
Old Jul 7, 2009 | 08:18 PM
  #8220  
Zillon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,976
From: Southeast PA
Default

Originally Posted by Elijahtc
GRAIN is sexier than NOISE
Totally the truth.

I miss shooting with film.



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:37 AM.