DSLR Owners Unite! (56k? Are you kidding me?)
From what I've read, the 24-105 is much better than the 24-70. Sure it's 1 stop up, but the IS on the 24-105 makes a hell of a difference compared to the IS-less 24-70. I'm still up in the air about the 70-200 f/4 IS vs. the non-IS one. People seem to rave about the IS version. I read a lot of people sell or trade their 70-200 f/2.8's to get the f/4L IS.
Dont get me wrong Robert, if I could I would rather have the 70-200f/4L with IS, it is by far better then its 2.8 counterpart. If you have the cash for the IS, I would say do it. But if you want closer range then the 24-105 is perfect. If you have a lot of cash then I would do both 
10-20, 24-105, 50, 70-200...that would be an amazing line up. Maybe add the 400L later hahaha

10-20, 24-105, 50, 70-200...that would be an amazing line up. Maybe add the 400L later hahaha
Dont get me wrong Robert, if I could I would rather have the 70-200f/4L with IS, it is by far better then its 2.8 counterpart. If you have the cash for the IS, I would say do it. But if you want closer range then the 24-105 is perfect. If you have a lot of cash then I would do both 
10-20, 24-105, 50, 70-200...that would be an amazing line up. Maybe add the 400L later hahaha

10-20, 24-105, 50, 70-200...that would be an amazing line up. Maybe add the 400L later hahaha
Ya, I feel ya. The more I read about the 24-105 i would rather have that then the 17-40. Plus I would love to the have the 10-22 hahaha. But ya, needz monies first hahaha.
yeah. i pretty much switch between it and my nifty fifty. but i've posting fisheye stuff because i have kind of a "kid with a new toy" syndrome. haha. and i love the first shot as well.
oh trust me I went through that syndrome too when i first bought my 15mm fisheye. Just think if u had a full frame sensor to go with it......
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
For the price of the STi, I would have said I just returned from the Chevy dealer, because I would have bought a year old Corvette instead. Got a WRX Premium.
Regardless, even the base Impreza 2.5i would be a massive improvement over a tC
.
And btw, they had a Forte Koup at the dealer...and compared the tC, I don't know why anyone would consider the tC lol.
Regardless, even the base Impreza 2.5i would be a massive improvement over a tC
And btw, they had a Forte Koup at the dealer...and compared the tC, I don't know why anyone would consider the tC lol.
Last edited by CarbonXe; Dec 30, 2009 at 02:43 AM.
For the price of the STi, I would have said I just returned from the Chevy dealer, because I would have bought a year old Corvette instead. Got a WRX Premium.
Regardless, even the base Impreza 2.5i would be a massive improvement over a tC
.
And btw, they had a Forte Koup at the dealer...and compared the tC, I don't know why anyone would consider the tC lol.
Regardless, even the base Impreza 2.5i would be a massive improvement over a tC
And btw, they had a Forte Koup at the dealer...and compared the tC, I don't know why anyone would consider the tC lol.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Don't hold your breath lol. If they can't locate one (only one 5-door at 5 dealers near me), they have to order one, which will take 6-8 weeks. I'd honestly rather them order one though, because then the paint wouldn't have been demolished by some car wash and it'll have no mileage on it.
I can't wait though :D.
I can't wait though :D.
Good choice. Exhaust and tune. Well over 300whp to all 4 wheels. Amazing stock suspension. Car is useful. If my tC was worth more money I would have traded my car in awhile ago. you know how I love Subarus. Good luck with it.









