60-1 Turbo 465 whp stock 2AZ-FE E85 (Updated!!!)
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,524
From: Oklahoma City From Brooklyn NYC
if your going by my post you will see I just posted prior to your hating that I was having sum issues and thats why the car wasnt performing to well. But its all good. I give everybody nothing but props on this site and for damn near all of my threads theres always a select few hater/trolls... the same haters/trolls talkin negative ish. Its old no, for those of you who doubt, think Im a liar or whatever just keep to yourself. Your just clogging up the thread.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,524
From: Oklahoma City From Brooklyn NYC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4v9GrxD-uDA
this is 400+ hp all day you prolly have around 350ish if not lower
this is 400+ hp all day you prolly have around 350ish if not lower
And this video doesnt really show me anything more than you dont know how to drive
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,524
From: Oklahoma City From Brooklyn NYC
there's really no reason for there to be any difference in the power if nothing about the car has changed and the tune and boost levels stayed the same. the only thing i can think of is the inaccurate, and now inconsistent, dyno that you keep using. im not trying to diss your project at all, just give you an outside perspective. if you keep getting weird readings from a dyno but want to keep using it because of the high numbers then be my guest. however, tunning on an inconsistent dyno is not good for your car.
there's really no reason for there to be any difference in the power if nothing about the car has changed and the tune and boost levels stayed the same. the only thing i can think of is the inaccurate, and now inconsistent, dyno that you keep using. im not trying to diss your project at all, just give you an outside perspective. if you keep getting weird readings from a dyno but want to keep using it because of the high numbers then be my guest. however, tunning on an inconsistent dyno is not good for your car.
QFTFT
there's really no reason for there to be any difference in the power if nothing about the car has changed and the tune and boost levels stayed the same. the only thing i can think of is the inaccurate, and now inconsistent, dyno that you keep using. im not trying to diss your project at all, just give you an outside perspective. if you keep getting weird readings from a dyno but want to keep using it because of the high numbers then be my guest. however, tunning on an inconsistent dyno is not good for your car.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,524
From: Oklahoma City From Brooklyn NYC
there's really no reason for there to be any difference in the power if nothing about the car has changed and the tune and boost levels stayed the same. the only thing i can think of is the inaccurate, and now inconsistent, dyno that you keep using. im not trying to diss your project at all, just give you an outside perspective. if you keep getting weird readings from a dyno but want to keep using it because of the high numbers then be my guest. however, tunning on an inconsistent dyno is not good for your car.
Boost level was the same. We did not change the tune to get the 470 but the tune itself was changed like the ECU compensated for something whenever it was screwed up. Like I said, the AFR's had changed prior to reset and changed again after reset. You can even check the two dyno sheets (455 and 470) the second is alot smoother... even weather could have effected it. Was like 100 degrees on first pull... but kinda dramatic for a weather change alone.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,524
From: Oklahoma City From Brooklyn NYC
i think he's been flamed enough, no need to keep going.. if he insist on believing what he thinks, then give it to him.. im sure nothing will be lost to those who knows.. I see what everyone thinks of his track and dyno numbers though
Boost level was the same. We did not change the tune to get the 470 but the tune itself was changed like the ECU compensated for something whenever it was screwed up. Like I said, the AFR's had changed prior to reset and changed again after reset. You can even check the two dyno sheets (455 and 470) the second is alot smoother... even weather could have effected it. Was like 100 degrees on first pull... but kinda dramatic for a weather change alone.
also, could you post up the first dyno sheet for us? im curious to see what the temp was at. cause this most recent one says 95 degrees. just curious to know what the temp difference was, not that intake temps matter as much on an ethanol powered car.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,524
From: Oklahoma City From Brooklyn NYC
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,524
From: Oklahoma City From Brooklyn NYC
Lets start reading before flaming folks!
Didnt see that last post, my bad. But there was an issue with my ECU. For sum reason it was in sum kinda limp mode. Have no idea why and when it happened. But unplugged ECU over night and the next dat car felt quicker. So went to hop on the dyno and it made this

I know people are gonna talk all kindsa crap again and it doesnt matter. But the car feels quicker... also feels like boost comes in a lil earlier. Dont know why. We didnt touch the tune at all on this dyno pull so I dont know what it could have been. Any ideas as to what could have happened are welcomed

I know people are gonna talk all kindsa crap again and it doesnt matter. But the car feels quicker... also feels like boost comes in a lil earlier. Dont know why. We didnt touch the tune at all on this dyno pull so I dont know what it could have been. Any ideas as to what could have happened are welcomed







