LT1 Camaro VS. SC tC
I've got I/H/E/pulley and short shifter and I am low 15s. 15.2ish consistant........14.9 is possible, but no way in hell is it likely to get a 14 flat NA.
At the most, even fully gutted, I would be surprised if my tC hit 14.5. I've held with a Golf 1.8T (intake and exhaust) but at his rear window from 20-120.
I would like to see a video of you running a 14 flat or in that case, anything lower than a 14.5 with only bolt ons. Not discrediting you, but Good luck.
At the most, even fully gutted, I would be surprised if my tC hit 14.5. I've held with a Golf 1.8T (intake and exhaust) but at his rear window from 20-120.
I would like to see a video of you running a 14 flat or in that case, anything lower than a 14.5 with only bolt ons. Not discrediting you, but Good luck.
Originally Posted by web
I've got I/H/E/pulley and short shifter and I am low 15s. 15.2ish consistant........14.9 is possible, but no way in hell is it likely to get a 14 flat NA.
At the most, even fully gutted, I would be surprised if my tC hit 14.5. I've held with a Golf 1.8T (intake and exhaust) but at his rear window from 20-120.
I would like to see a video of you running a 14 flat or in that case, anything lower than a 14.5 with only bolt ons. Not discrediting you, but Good luck.
At the most, even fully gutted, I would be surprised if my tC hit 14.5. I've held with a Golf 1.8T (intake and exhaust) but at his rear window from 20-120.
I would like to see a video of you running a 14 flat or in that case, anything lower than a 14.5 with only bolt ons. Not discrediting you, but Good luck.
ummm...no one said 14 flat. If you are talking to me, I said 14.8-15 flat. Maybe I missed something, but who said they can run 14 flat with I/H/E is from another planet, either that or they have a tubular framed that's only 1700lbs.
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
rhythmnsmoke: The only answer I have for you Travis is try to find a s/c tC then drive a tC with I/H/E and you will see the difference. I had I/H/E then droped the Intake and added the S/C and Pulley that is one hell of a difference now let me tell you. Never hit the track with my I/H/E set-up but I can assure you with the I/H/E it's nowhere near as quick as with Super/H/E/Pulley. But I havent hit the track yet, So I can't post any times. Will be hitting the track when my Bracket is fixed though.
If it's one thing you will learn about me, is that I speak from experience, not hypotheticals. Second part is that I was not talking about a modded S/C. I was talking about a $3k dollar price tag to go as fast as oooh..$1k. Yes, a modded S/C will be faster than an I/H/E setup tC. Just S/C only though...naw, my money is on the N/A'ed setup. Then the S/C guy goes home orders a header, and Intake, then he would sway my vote to his side of the fence.
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
FYI...LS2 GTO is recored at 13.9 1/4th in stock form. Straight from GM's website.
Originally Posted by web
NM, I believe the first versions (i think 04 were the 5.7s and the new ones are 6.0s)
Even the older 5.7 model will run better then the 13.9 that he quoted from their website.
His turbo tC does not have enough power to beat that car from a roll.. From the line it wouldn't even be a race, even if the tC was on DR's.
If that LS2 hooked up on the line, then yeah, no contest. If it spun and the tC hooked up, it would seriously take some good shifting to catch it by mid track, but I do agree that it would still lose to the GTO in the 1/4, but not by more than 1-1.5 lengths if that. If the tC has a good driver, then maybe it could at least only lose by 1 length.
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
rhythmnsmoke: The only answer I have for you Travis is try to find a s/c tC then drive a tC with I/H/E and you will see the difference. I had I/H/E then droped the Intake and added the S/C and Pulley that is one hell of a difference now let me tell you. Never hit the track with my I/H/E set-up but I can assure you with the I/H/E it's nowhere near as quick as with Super/H/E/Pulley. But I havent hit the track yet, So I can't post any times. Will be hitting the track when my Bracket is fixed though.
If it's one thing you will learn about me, is that I speak from experience, not hypotheticals. Second part is that I was not talking about a modded S/C. I was talking about a $3k dollar price tag to go as fast as oooh..$1k. Yes, a modded S/C will be faster than an I/H/E setup tC. Just S/C only though...naw, my money is on the N/A'ed setup. Then the S/C guy goes home orders a header, and Intake, then he would sway my vote to his side of the fence.
Not to argue or anything, but the I/H/E/Pulley setup of a tC I recorded clicking 14.8-15 flat runs was not gutted. It was full factory trim. And dyno #'s are overrated. You can not just judge a race by the PEAK HP #'s alone. You have to factor in how the cars PRODUCE the power it has.
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by 06SuperWhite_SoCal_tC
rhythmnsmoke: The only answer I have for you Travis is try to find a s/c tC then drive a tC with I/H/E and you will see the difference. I had I/H/E then droped the Intake and added the S/C and Pulley that is one hell of a difference now let me tell you. Never hit the track with my I/H/E set-up but I can assure you with the I/H/E it's nowhere near as quick as with Super/H/E/Pulley. But I havent hit the track yet, So I can't post any times. Will be hitting the track when my Bracket is fixed though.
If it's one thing you will learn about me, is that I speak from experience, not hypotheticals. Second part is that I was not talking about a modded S/C. I was talking about a $3k dollar price tag to go as fast as oooh..$1k. Yes, a modded S/C will be faster than an I/H/E setup tC. Just S/C only though...naw, my money is on the N/A'ed setup. Then the S/C guy goes home orders a header, and Intake, then he would sway my vote to his side of the fence.
Not to argue or anything, but the I/H/E/Pulley setup of a tC I recorded clicking 14.8-15 flat runs was not gutted. It was full factory trim. And dyno #'s are overrated. You can not just judge a race by the PEAK HP #'s alone. You have to factor in how the cars PRODUCE the power it has.
Free spinning on a dyno is nice for numbers but times are a lot harder to achieve.
Originally Posted by DouBLeJ16
I have no idea why it says that on their website but they run much times bone stock. 13.9 is way off.
Originally Posted by DouBLeJ16
His turbo tC does not have enough power to beat that car from a roll.. From the line it wouldn't even be a race, even if the tC was on DR's.
Originally Posted by web
If that LS2 hooked up on the line, then yeah, no contest. If it spun and the tC hooked up, it would seriously take some good shifting to catch it by mid track, but I do agree that it would still lose to the GTO in the 1/4, but not by more than 1-1.5 lengths if that. If the tC has a good driver, then maybe it could at least only lose by 1 length.
MikeScion ran a 12.7 in the 1/4 on a out of the box ZPI Stage 1 kit set @ 11 PSI...
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by web
If that LS2 hooked up on the line, then yeah, no contest. If it spun and the tC hooked up, it would seriously take some good shifting to catch it by mid track, but I do agree that it would still lose to the GTO in the 1/4, but not by more than 1-1.5 lengths if that. If the tC has a good driver, then maybe it could at least only lose by 1 length.
MikeScion ran a 12.7 in the 1/4 on a out of the box ZPI Stage 1 kit set @ 11 PSI...
Gutted and only a racing bucket in it?
Originally Posted by web
Originally Posted by rhythmnsmoke
Originally Posted by web
If that LS2 hooked up on the line, then yeah, no contest. If it spun and the tC hooked up, it would seriously take some good shifting to catch it by mid track, but I do agree that it would still lose to the GTO in the 1/4, but not by more than 1-1.5 lengths if that. If the tC has a good driver, then maybe it could at least only lose by 1 length.
MikeScion ran a 12.7 in the 1/4 on a out of the box ZPI Stage 1 kit set @ 11 PSI...
Gutted and only a racing bucket in it?
Full Interior, Daily Driven, 11ish PSI ZPI Stage 1. He has the time slip by the way.
Hey, that's cool. Good for him. Like I said, I wasn't doubting him, but I was honestly sceptical. I knew there was a possibility it could be done, but just wanted to see what came of it. Congratulations to him though.
No time slip necessary.
No time slip necessary.





