Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...

PTUNING: Project RedLine Time Attack tC (updated pics pg 16)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 07:14 PM
  #321  
kanundrum's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,114
From: Laurel, MD
Default

Originally Posted by Complication
So am I blind def and dumb, or is that a drum brake in that 7th picture...
seems like the ebrake to me ?
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 07:22 PM
  #322  
tCeeder's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,783
Default

yes that is the E-brake, the pads clamp to the inside of the rear discs/rotors.
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 10:34 PM
  #323  
davedavetC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 20,410
Default

yup
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 11:17 PM
  #324  
Nick06tC's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,277
From: Andersen AFB, Guam
Default

Its the ebrake. I think they were pointing out the conversion of thread pattern away from 5x110. I dont think they were pointing out the ebrake!!!

(not sure what the new pattern is)
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #325  
imsonofagun's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,109
From: Woodbridge, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Nick06tC
Its the ebrake. I think they were pointing out the conversion of thread pattern away from 5x110. I dont think they were pointing out the ebrake!!!

(not sure what the new pattern is)
It's not a conversion, just different/stronger wheel studs. It's still a 5x100 bolt pattern.
Old Jul 13, 2008 | 11:40 PM
  #326  
Nick06tC's Avatar
Senior Member

10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,277
From: Andersen AFB, Guam
Default

I could have sworn they said they were doing a conversion

And I dont know why I put 110.
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 11:31 PM
  #327  
imsonofagun's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,109
From: Woodbridge, VA
Default

They said they might consider it at a later point in time. It would be interesting to see, but not sure it would be worth it for the average person.
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 11:32 PM
  #328  
t_urbo_C_harged's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,184
From: Blue Springs, MO
Default

lol no conversion, just stronger studs, they did say they were "looking" into doing a conversion, but don't plan on it until winter I believe.
Old Jul 21, 2008 | 02:41 AM
  #329  
AdmirN's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 652
From: St. Louis, MO
Default

how come you guys went from the kaminari body kit to the stock bumper and the oem lip kit.
Old Jul 21, 2008 | 06:45 PM
  #330  
fox's Avatar
fox
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 752
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by AdmirN
how come you guys went from the kaminari body kit to the stock bumper and the oem lip kit.
The Kaminari kit, while nice looking, serves no aerodynamic advantage over the stock. The stock bumper has better function in terms of modifying it. There is only so much that can be done to the Kaminari kit for what they need out of it.
Old Jul 22, 2008 | 03:20 AM
  #331  
blown_xa's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,902
From: PTuning
Default

Originally Posted by AdmirN
how come you guys went from the kaminari body kit to the stock bumper and the oem lip kit.
yep plus the Kaminari kit adds a good 20 lbs at least, fitment isnt s good as oem, more brittle Urethane compared to oem. When building a race car potential issues must be minimized to ensure reliability on the race-track, including body parts.
Also the front bumper is removed a lot on this tC, ease of removal and installing is important too... nothing beats oem body parts in that respect.
Old Jul 22, 2008 | 04:32 AM
  #332  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Just to add....I don't think the Kaminari kit is "race" purpose if you ask me. Looks like a cosmetic mod, rather than a functional race mod.
Old Jul 22, 2008 | 09:43 PM
  #333  
boosthappy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 138
Default

whats the turbo lag on this build
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 05:16 AM
  #334  
Cracker_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 121
From: Miami, FL
Default

Originally Posted by boosthappy
whats the turbo lag on this build
I don't remember seeing proof of this (dyno sheets), but i'm pretty sure as far as turbo kits go for the tc, this would be the kit that has less turbo lag because of the length of the turbo->i/c->throttle body pipes go, diameter of the tubes might affect negatively as well, again, not pretty sure of the results, we might just have to wait for them to finish the car and post dyno sheets.
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 07:04 AM
  #335  
bluaeon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 748
From: 909 CA
Default

turbo lag does not mean the shorter the tube, the less it has... turbo lag is how fast will it spool (the turbo) to its full potential, the turbo that is. the longer it takes (more RPM) to spool up the turbo, the more lag it has... hence turbo lag.
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 07:19 AM
  #336  
Cracker_tC's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 121
From: Miami, FL
Default

yes, agreed, that would be the influence of turbo size, manifold, etc. but in other means the longer or bigger the tube, the more pressure it takes for the boost to build up and reach the engine, also, you can help this by having a smaller diameter tube, for speed, less time for pressure build up.
again, im no turbo expert.
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #337  
HyPn0TiC's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 474
Default

This car is amazing. I've seen it a few times while going through this build. Last time I saw it was list Thursday night when I picked my car up. Mr. C was there to help us getting my car loadeed up even though it was like 1130PM and he still made the time to show my friends a few things about the car. Mr. C, being there at that time helping us out is a perfect example of why PTuning is the best shop around and the only shop my car will be going to for work anymore.

Oh, I cant wait to see this car finished and on the track.
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 11:44 PM
  #338  
t_urbo_C_harged's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,184
From: Blue Springs, MO
Default

Good to hear hypnotic! I would love an update on this project if you have one ptuning...
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 03:11 AM
  #339  
blown_xa's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,902
From: PTuning
Default

ah updates will be heard soon, but the next few days are crunch time on getting it done as last night we stayed till 1:30am knocking things off the list.... Im sure the next couple of nights will be the same im sure.
The Nashville time attack is this weekend and there is still stuff to be done. Looking good though!

Somebody mentioned spool up time? look on earlier pages for dyno sheets. The larger ic pipes actually decrease spool up time... opposite of what you presume. When flow is increased then there is less backpressure on the turbine thus spool up is faster. The intake tube is a 4" diameter, ic pipes are 3.5" i believe. But also yes the turbo size must come into account as well as manifold runner length and bends. Effeciancy is key. (excuse spelling lol)
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 11:48 AM
  #340  
rhythmnsmoke's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Music City Scions
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,747
From: TN
Default

Reading Tech articles, they always point in the direction of having smaller intercooler pipes, for the purpose of the smaller the pipe, the faster the air will travel through to the engine.



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17 AM.