best 10 inch sub????
Originally Posted by PhatTc
If you a pounding sub go with Boston or Elemental Designs... I have a 1- 12" Boston with about 600 watts going to it and I hit 138.8 db...
what kind of box is the boston in and which boston?
Originally Posted by Tcguy85
Originally Posted by PhatTc
If you a pounding sub go with Boston or Elemental Designs... I have a 1- 12" Boston with about 600 watts going to it and I hit 138.8 db...
what kind of box is the boston in and which boston?
Originally Posted by Clean_XB
I agree with you on the something different part. The W7 is not for the inexperienced, or those on a budjet
its easy for anyone to quote the specs from the website, the reason that they are there is to avoid warranty issues and liability.
especially because the primary method for mounting the W7 is ported, because it is a SPL woofer. in a ported design, the ability to distort the woofer is much greater, which im sure you all know by now. hence the reason why the spec chart showes the LOWEST possible max RMS rating. JL themselves may not even admit this because of liability issues. look in your owners manual, and you will be shocked to find that the woofer can handle up to 750. again, 1000/1 turned WAYY down is still a safe bet
im sure you all have "had this setup in 100 cars" before, but if you know the mechanics behind the woofer, and spent soem hours with personal friends from JLs R&D team, then you will know what you are talking about
you may be happy with your setup on the 500/1 with 10W7, and I applaud you for that
its easy for anyone to quote the specs from the website, the reason that they are there is to avoid warranty issues and liability.
especially because the primary method for mounting the W7 is ported, because it is a SPL woofer. in a ported design, the ability to distort the woofer is much greater, which im sure you all know by now. hence the reason why the spec chart showes the LOWEST possible max RMS rating. JL themselves may not even admit this because of liability issues. look in your owners manual, and you will be shocked to find that the woofer can handle up to 750. again, 1000/1 turned WAYY down is still a safe bet
im sure you all have "had this setup in 100 cars" before, but if you know the mechanics behind the woofer, and spent soem hours with personal friends from JLs R&D team, then you will know what you are talking about
you may be happy with your setup on the 500/1 with 10W7, and I applaud you for that
I would hope the guy could hit a high number with 32 of those speakers lol. Don't think it was 157 though.
Senior Member



Strictly Scionized
SL Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,284
From: White Marsh, Balti Co., MD
Originally Posted by nebster
Originally Posted by trialsindude
Where's the 6.5" doing 157 at?
Senior Member



Strictly Scionized
SL Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,284
From: White Marsh, Balti Co., MD
Originally Posted by YanksFan
Originally Posted by Clean_XB
I agree with you on the something different part. The W7 is not for the inexperienced, or those on a budjet
its easy for anyone to quote the specs from the website, the reason that they are there is to avoid warranty issues and liability.
especially because the primary method for mounting the W7 is ported, because it is a SPL woofer. in a ported design, the ability to distort the woofer is much greater, which im sure you all know by now. hence the reason why the spec chart showes the LOWEST possible max RMS rating. JL themselves may not even admit this because of liability issues. look in your owners manual, and you will be shocked to find that the woofer can handle up to 750. again, 1000/1 turned WAYY down is still a safe bet
im sure you all have "had this setup in 100 cars" before, but if you know the mechanics behind the woofer, and spent soem hours with personal friends from JLs R&D team, then you will know what you are talking about
you may be happy with your setup on the 500/1 with 10W7, and I applaud you for that
its easy for anyone to quote the specs from the website, the reason that they are there is to avoid warranty issues and liability.
especially because the primary method for mounting the W7 is ported, because it is a SPL woofer. in a ported design, the ability to distort the woofer is much greater, which im sure you all know by now. hence the reason why the spec chart showes the LOWEST possible max RMS rating. JL themselves may not even admit this because of liability issues. look in your owners manual, and you will be shocked to find that the woofer can handle up to 750. again, 1000/1 turned WAYY down is still a safe bet
im sure you all have "had this setup in 100 cars" before, but if you know the mechanics behind the woofer, and spent soem hours with personal friends from JLs R&D team, then you will know what you are talking about
you may be happy with your setup on the 500/1 with 10W7, and I applaud you for that
I would hope the guy could hit a high number with 32 of those speakers lol. Don't think it was 157 though.
Back in the day I fed a 12w0(125watts rms) 600watts all day long for many many months with no problems with a PPI A600.2 amp. Til one day I killed it buy just playing it hard and long.
Let me try and understand the OP with this summary:
You have a bazooka tube, want to keep the enclosure and replace the sub, and want the optimal sub for it?
If this is the case, we need to know what the internal volume of the box is to give a solid reccommendation. The above mentioned subs (Alpine, JL, Kicker, et. al.) may not sound good in your enclosure, even though they can sound phenominal in one designed for them.
Can you list:
Hole diameter,
Outer diameter
Depth
Wall thickness
or
If you have a model number for the tube we (the community) may be able to find something. I will stress again, I read the OP as saying they're looking for the best sub that is designed for the dimensions of the Bazooka tube, not what the "best" 10" is overall. Also, it is not just a matter of it physically fitting in the sub, but also being designed to work in the enclosure volume of the tube.
FYI, I have two 8w7's. I used to have one running off of a 250/1 and built an underseat enclosure for it. The box was undersized to fit the seat, but it did not sound great. I built a second box to manufacturers specifications and, with the same amp settings, was almost three times as loud. I went from a subwoofer gain on the head unit of +8 to 0 for comperable output. I'm now in the process of making a second enclosure for the other 8w7 and will run them both off of a 500/1, it will be quite loud when I'm finished.
Side story, I had the box sitting on the floor pan facing upward. I dropped a penny on the cone while it was playing and it launched it in the air enough to hit the headliner with some force, the w7 has some insane displacement though it doesn't directly translate to increased volume. They were ebay, have no warranty but I did order them from a vendor who does allow returns for defects on JL subs. Some sell them as is with no return, so buy carefully if you go that route. Retail, the price is not worth the quality and output, I could buy 2 without warranty for the price of one with full coverage. Note: the 10w1, 3 and 6 all require the same internal volume for sealed applications, .625 cu ft. The w7 needs 1.25 cu ft. and would not be suitable. Trust me, go small on the w7 box and it will sound like crap, I'm on my fourth box design to meet both speaker volume requirements and vehicle space dimension requirements (moved it from under seat to rear quarter panel, but there is a wheelchair ramp that requires clearance, had to go all fiberglass)
You have a bazooka tube, want to keep the enclosure and replace the sub, and want the optimal sub for it?
If this is the case, we need to know what the internal volume of the box is to give a solid reccommendation. The above mentioned subs (Alpine, JL, Kicker, et. al.) may not sound good in your enclosure, even though they can sound phenominal in one designed for them.
Can you list:
Hole diameter,
Outer diameter
Depth
Wall thickness
or
If you have a model number for the tube we (the community) may be able to find something. I will stress again, I read the OP as saying they're looking for the best sub that is designed for the dimensions of the Bazooka tube, not what the "best" 10" is overall. Also, it is not just a matter of it physically fitting in the sub, but also being designed to work in the enclosure volume of the tube.
FYI, I have two 8w7's. I used to have one running off of a 250/1 and built an underseat enclosure for it. The box was undersized to fit the seat, but it did not sound great. I built a second box to manufacturers specifications and, with the same amp settings, was almost three times as loud. I went from a subwoofer gain on the head unit of +8 to 0 for comperable output. I'm now in the process of making a second enclosure for the other 8w7 and will run them both off of a 500/1, it will be quite loud when I'm finished.
Side story, I had the box sitting on the floor pan facing upward. I dropped a penny on the cone while it was playing and it launched it in the air enough to hit the headliner with some force, the w7 has some insane displacement though it doesn't directly translate to increased volume. They were ebay, have no warranty but I did order them from a vendor who does allow returns for defects on JL subs. Some sell them as is with no return, so buy carefully if you go that route. Retail, the price is not worth the quality and output, I could buy 2 without warranty for the price of one with full coverage. Note: the 10w1, 3 and 6 all require the same internal volume for sealed applications, .625 cu ft. The w7 needs 1.25 cu ft. and would not be suitable. Trust me, go small on the w7 box and it will sound like crap, I'm on my fourth box design to meet both speaker volume requirements and vehicle space dimension requirements (moved it from under seat to rear quarter panel, but there is a wheelchair ramp that requires clearance, had to go all fiberglass)
the dayton i believe is only a s4 so the best you could do is a 4 ohm load i believe.... which puts you looking for a 600 watt rms at 4 ohm load
here's one
http://www.edesignaudio.com/edv2/pro...products_id=44
you can find them used for around 300 and with a 5 year warranty you can't go wrong
here's one
http://www.edesignaudio.com/edv2/pro...products_id=44
you can find them used for around 300 and with a 5 year warranty you can't go wrong
Originally Posted by nebster
the dayton i believe is only a s4 so the best you could do is a 4 ohm load i believe.... which puts you looking for a 600 watt rms at 4 ohm load
here's one
http://www.edesignaudio.com/edv2/pro...products_id=44
you can find them used for around 300 and with a 5 year warranty you can't go wrong
here's one
http://www.edesignaudio.com/edv2/pro...products_id=44
you can find them used for around 300 and with a 5 year warranty you can't go wrong
i have one of the HO tens in .7 cubic foot net ported to 30hz. it gets plenty loud off of my 400 watts amp. i'm not even pushing the amp very hard either. ported they are very efficient subs.
well at least marketing works even though the economy is going to ____. to anyone who has heard atleast an Fi Q and ID Q please speak up. Everyone else please shut up. a w3 and type-r is garbage compared to what's out there. and wtf does best mean? you want the thing blowing your brain out or reproducing sound like you were in the recording studio.
ps - Neb you forgot about the Alpine PDX amps.
ps - Neb you forgot about the Alpine PDX amps.
Originally Posted by Keeshwah
well at least marketing works even though the economy is going to poop. to anyone who has heard atleast an Fi Q and ID Q please speak up. Everyone else please shut up. a w3 and type-r is garbage compared to what's out there. and wtf does best mean? you want the thing blowing your brain out or reproducing sound like you were in the recording studio.
ps - Neb you forgot about the Alpine PDX amps.
ps - Neb you forgot about the Alpine PDX amps.

Also, thank you for revealing the HUGE marketing ploy that most people here are caught in lol... recommending nothing but Type R's, JL's, etc. is just because companies like those have imprinted such an image in people that they immediately think it's THE best. They are good, no doubt, but if you know audio well enough, you'll see there are MUCH better out there.
AND, thanks for bringing PDX's into the discussion, I think they are among the best in the industry for their price/performance/size/power divisions.
If you really want a high quality, HIGH end sub, look into Resonant Engineering, TC/Audiopulse, Fi, DD, ID, etc.
/end rant-ish thingy



