Notices
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
2005-2010 [ANT10]
View Poll Results: What's more important to you?
Function
79.84%
Form
20.16%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

Next Generation tC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 07:46 PM
  #61  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by gcxandy
No one has mentioned this but i live in NYC and i wouldn't mind the next tC with mirrors that FOLD in!!!
RTFT
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 07:47 PM
  #62  
Checho's Avatar
Banned
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team ScionEyed
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,715
From: Mayami
Default

Not necessarily more HP but LESS WEIGHT..at 3000 lbs its kinda hard to be pushing 140 to the wheels.

find a way to trim maybe 300 lbs and we would notice a nicer ride.

The suspension needs to have a lower center of gravity
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 08:28 PM
  #63  
NightGlide's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 510
From: Nightmare, MS
Default

Originally Posted by TwztedtC
A damn 6 speed please cause Im tired of running at 3000+ rpms on the interstate
X2
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 08:37 PM
  #64  
djct_watt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Default

Originally Posted by kbanksttc
This is good stuff. Definitely the most responsive forum so far. I can't do anything for vehicle performance guys. Mostly this evaluation is for the ergonomics while driving and driver to vehicle inputs. Thanks a lot for your replies.
Sorry.... Yes, we are a very active forum, but unfortunately, most people here don't know how to read, and only skim the pages for the pictures.

Well, my original post still stands, as it is not performance related; get rid of the stupid bubble grill. I'll also add a second note.

I don't mind the throws of the OEM 5 spd, but does it really have to look like an erect male appendage? Note that this is common on many Toyota's and scion's, where the shift gate is too low, resulting in a very long shift column. It just looks horrible. IMO short shifters are worthless, but i'm really tempted to get one, because the OEM shifter is just so ugly.

Take note from shift ****/gate height on BMW's for good design.
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 08:41 PM
  #65  
djct_watt's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,320
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Default

And your poll is completely rediculous. Both form and function are equally important! The German's seem to understand this very well, ie BMW and VW. But unfortunately for them, they don't understand the meaning of reliability.

Why is it so hard for automotive companies to integrate form, function, AND reliability?
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #66  
Kosterfield's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 59
From: Cedar Rapids, IA
Default

I'd like to see a V6 option. That's Something they should have done the first time around, pair it with a 6 speed manual or 5 auto. (like the 05 V6 Camrys)
Stock HIDs
Pure Pricing Parts?
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 10:08 PM
  #67  
RodC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,581
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

This thread is funny. If you add together all the suggestions, you get a $50,000 car.
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 10:18 PM
  #68  
BlizZard's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,332
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by RodC
This thread is funny. If you add together all the suggestions, you get a $50,000 car.
I'm not down to buy a $50,000 scion lol
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 10:20 PM
  #69  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by BlizZard
Originally Posted by RodC
This thread is funny. If you add together all the suggestions, you get a $50,000 car.
I'm not down to buy a $50,000 scion lol
If you think about all the options mentioned, V6, rwd, 6 speed...people basically want an IS350 with a Scion logo.
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 10:28 PM
  #70  
QK5ILVR's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 70
Default

I'd enjoy different a different color for the interior lights, amber is way too boring.

This is a longshot, but maybe offering a rear sunroof that opens as well?

I agree that more supportive seats would be a great improvement, and that the interior choice with the wavy ridges in the dashboard is not the greatest and could be changed to something else.

Keeping the center console design with the radio cover would be cool but modifying it to look different would be a must.

Definitely creating some more unique RS versions of the tC, the 3.0 and 4.0 in my opinion are lame
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 10:33 PM
  #71  
jaxtcracer's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,686
From: Jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally Posted by TwztedtC
A damn 6 speed please cause Im tired of running at 3000+ rpms on the interstate
x2000000

i hate my highway RPMs.. they are truly awful
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 10:35 PM
  #72  
BuddhasTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SoCal tC Club
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,003
From: Diamond Bar, CA
Default

pretty much everything has been covered but...

6 spd tranny (and no tiptronic crap)
RWD or AWD
longer gear ratios
a better displaced inline 4
stock turbo setup to pass CARB regulations
more colors...give like a gold or even the burnt penny color, or si blue...something
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #73  
aRucard's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 320
Default

don't change the exterior too much, i love how the tc looks now
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 11:29 PM
  #74  
JCM900's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 85
Default

6 speed
RWD/AWD
MORE POWER.... Keep it a 4 banger though
TRD TURBO
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 11:32 PM
  #75  
R2D2's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 985
Default

O & I forgot to add 8K+ redline as well as a HUD
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 11:33 PM
  #76  
RodC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,581
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

And a heated cup holder.
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 11:44 PM
  #77  
kbanksttc's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 8
From: Arizona
Default

I don't personally feel the poll is rediculous. In certain cases function necessitates form. Like F1 cars (gorgeous) and the Lotus Exige, the FD RX7's and 1992 GTR's. When I say function I mean you would rather have a shifter that is properly weighted with a firm, direct throw made of rubber; instead of when I say form, which would be a shifter that glows different colors and carbon fiber.
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 11:51 PM
  #78  
R2D2's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 985
Default

Actually, I've been hearing solid bushings replacing the rubber ones have shown to function better (via Doc I's bushings)

Definitely Function over Form by 60/40 or 70/30 (IMO) ~ Doing it right is a MUST, but since it's being accomplished you might as well do it with some style.
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 11:54 PM
  #79  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

This kind of post is usually noticed.

Originally Posted by kbanksttc
This is good stuff. Definitely the most responsive forum so far. I can't do anything for vehicle performance guys. Mostly this evaluation is for the ergonomics while driving and driver to vehicle inputs. Thanks a lot for your replies.
Originally Posted by kbanksttc
This is good stuff. Definitely the most responsive forum so far. I can't do anything for vehicle performance guys. Mostly this evaluation is for the ergonomics while driving and driver to vehicle inputs. Thanks a lot for your replies.
Originally Posted by kbanksttc
This is good stuff. Definitely the most responsive forum so far. I can't do anything for vehicle performance guys. Mostly this evaluation is for the ergonomics while driving and driver to vehicle inputs. Thanks a lot for your replies.
Originally Posted by kbanksttc
This is good stuff. Definitely the most responsive forum so far. I can't do anything for vehicle performance guys. Mostly this evaluation is for the ergonomics while driving and driver to vehicle inputs. Thanks a lot for your replies.
Originally Posted by kbanksttc
This is good stuff. Definitely the most responsive forum so far. I can't do anything for vehicle performance guys. Mostly this evaluation is for the ergonomics while driving and driver to vehicle inputs. Thanks a lot for your replies.
Originally Posted by kbanksttc
This is good stuff. Definitely the most responsive forum so far. I can't do anything for vehicle performance guys. Mostly this evaluation is for the ergonomics while driving and driver to vehicle inputs. Thanks a lot for your replies.
Originally Posted by kbanksttc
This is good stuff. Definitely the most responsive forum so far. I can't do anything for vehicle performance guys. Mostly this evaluation is for the ergonomics while driving and driver to vehicle inputs. Thanks a lot for your replies.
There ya go, since no one wants to read the thread.
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 12:02 AM
  #80  
jjos1's Avatar
Banned
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,605
Default

I would say
6 speed
mirrors with defrost
hid at least as an option

and a turbo



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 PM.