TRD tC Supercharger release date and price!!! NO JOKE!!!!
Originally Posted by 808tC
i think that the purpose of getting a supercharger is to get more power, but why not get more with turbo......i would rather go a turbo set up and if the turbo messes up my car, i would take it back to the turbo place that sold me the item and argue that it broke my car......not to metion, pre-order turbo prices are cheaper and have more horsepower and torque than superchargers
Originally Posted by rsx_freak79
i think the deciding factor on why people want the SC is that it will be covered under warranty.
Originally Posted by Kwiksilver
Originally Posted by rsx_freak79
i think the deciding factor on why people want the SC is that it will be covered under warranty.
Originally Posted by rsx_freak79
Originally Posted by Kwiksilver
Originally Posted by rsx_freak79
i think the deciding factor on why people want the SC is that it will be covered under warranty.
I never understood why people diss Hondas. Is there something bad about building efficient, reliable, quality cars? I know some people have ruined the reputation of the company a little bit (rice & Civics) but the cars are great.
Take the RSX Type S for example. 210hp from a NA 2.0L I4 engine matched to one of the most smooth/precise shifting 6-speeds, and getting the MPG of an economy. Show me one other NA 4-banger with this much power and reliability. Lame Honda!
I could at least see this type of crap coming from people with muscle cars who think there is no replacement for displacement, but from Toyota owners? Oh yeah because a 2.4L is so much manlier than a 2.0L?
Take the RSX Type S for example. 210hp from a NA 2.0L I4 engine matched to one of the most smooth/precise shifting 6-speeds, and getting the MPG of an economy. Show me one other NA 4-banger with this much power and reliability. Lame Honda!
I could at least see this type of crap coming from people with muscle cars who think there is no replacement for displacement, but from Toyota owners? Oh yeah because a 2.4L is so much manlier than a 2.0L?
Originally Posted by dmikon
I never understood why people diss Hondas. Is there something bad about building efficient, reliable, quality cars? I know some people have ruined the reputation of the company a little bit (rice & Civics) but the cars are great.
Take the RSX Type S for example. 210hp from a NA 2.0L I4 engine matched to one of the most smooth/precise shifting 6-speeds, and getting the MPG of an economy. Show me one other NA 4-banger with this much power and reliability. Lame Honda!
I could at least see this type of crap coming from people with muscle cars who think there is no replacement for displacement, but from Toyota owners? Oh yeah because a 2.4L is so much manlier than a 2.0L?
Take the RSX Type S for example. 210hp from a NA 2.0L I4 engine matched to one of the most smooth/precise shifting 6-speeds, and getting the MPG of an economy. Show me one other NA 4-banger with this much power and reliability. Lame Honda!
I could at least see this type of crap coming from people with muscle cars who think there is no replacement for displacement, but from Toyota owners? Oh yeah because a 2.4L is so much manlier than a 2.0L?
i agree w/ you 100%.
i just think honda cars period are just boring imean their really conservative looking but reliable but i think they are seeing that themselves and that why they are changing that image with the new civic. i owned a 99tl so reliablity was a real issue with that car but that a different subject.
the supercharger by the way was confirmed by my dealership for september release with a bump around 200hp not at the wheels though.
the supercharger by the way was confirmed by my dealership for september release with a bump around 200hp not at the wheels though.
Originally Posted by freeflowing
i just think honda cars period are just boring imean their really conservative looking but reliable but i think they are seeing that themselves and that why they are changing that image with the new civic. i owned a 99tl so reliablity was a real issue with that car but that a different subject.
the supercharger by the way was confirmed by my dealership for september release with a bump around 200hp not at the wheels though.
the supercharger by the way was confirmed by my dealership for september release with a bump around 200hp not at the wheels though.
Originally Posted by freeflowing
i just think honda cars period are just boring imean their really conservative looking but reliable but i think they are seeing that themselves and that why they are changing that image with the new civic. i owned a 99tl so reliablity was a real issue with that car but that a different subject.
the supercharger by the way was confirmed by my dealership for september release with a bump around 200hp not at the wheels though.
the supercharger by the way was confirmed by my dealership for september release with a bump around 200hp not at the wheels though.
this is BS. a mod/admin deleted my post but didn't delete seminoles68 post. they just edited his post and left it. why couldn't they just have edited my post? guess i have to have a scion to get away w/ that ****.
Senior Member



AlphaSquad
Seven City Scions
SL Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 558
From: Virginia Beach, VA
sorry freak........some of the mods/admin round here are a******s............. but there is nothing wrong with honda's............its the people that turn the honda name into something bad..........take scion for insistance..........i talked to a few honda heads bout the b16 engine and they told me that i was teh coolest scion owner they have met cause everyone driving a tC they have met thought they were better then them. i apologized to them for that. they invited me to join there import club. said id think about it. there are just a few people out there can ruin it for everybody and thats what usually happens........on a side note, i got respect for you to come on scionlife as a honda owner not start the rsx is better than the tC posts and start arguements. very civil. you get a
Originally Posted by rsx_freak79
this is BS. a mod/admin deleted my post but didn't delete seminoles68 post. they just edited his post and left it. why couldn't they just have edited my post? guess i have to have a scion to get away w/ that ****.
Originally Posted by dmikon
I never understood why people diss Hondas. Is there something bad about building efficient, reliable, quality cars? I know some people have ruined the reputation of the company a little bit (rice & Civics) but the cars are great.
Take the RSX Type S for example. 210hp from a NA 2.0L I4 engine matched to one of the most smooth/precise shifting 6-speeds, and getting the MPG of an economy. Show me one other NA 4-banger with this much power and reliability. Lame Honda!
I could at least see this type of crap coming from people with muscle cars who think there is no replacement for displacement, but from Toyota owners? Oh yeah because a 2.4L is so much manlier than a 2.0L?
Take the RSX Type S for example. 210hp from a NA 2.0L I4 engine matched to one of the most smooth/precise shifting 6-speeds, and getting the MPG of an economy. Show me one other NA 4-banger with this much power and reliability. Lame Honda!
I could at least see this type of crap coming from people with muscle cars who think there is no replacement for displacement, but from Toyota owners? Oh yeah because a 2.4L is so much manlier than a 2.0L?
Originally Posted by yokillr
Originally Posted by dmikon
I never understood why people diss Hondas. Is there something bad about building efficient, reliable, quality cars? I know some people have ruined the reputation of the company a little bit (rice & Civics) but the cars are great.
Take the RSX Type S for example. 210hp from a NA 2.0L I4 engine matched to one of the most smooth/precise shifting 6-speeds, and getting the MPG of an economy. Show me one other NA 4-banger with this much power and reliability. Lame Honda!
I could at least see this type of crap coming from people with muscle cars who think there is no replacement for displacement, but from Toyota owners? Oh yeah because a 2.4L is so much manlier than a 2.0L?
Take the RSX Type S for example. 210hp from a NA 2.0L I4 engine matched to one of the most smooth/precise shifting 6-speeds, and getting the MPG of an economy. Show me one other NA 4-banger with this much power and reliability. Lame Honda!
I could at least see this type of crap coming from people with muscle cars who think there is no replacement for displacement, but from Toyota owners? Oh yeah because a 2.4L is so much manlier than a 2.0L?
there nothing wrong with honda but
when i say boring im mean the overall design. i owned a couple of hondas and an an 99 acura tl to boot so there no freakin way im bias at all. i just think honda should stop going the same old route when designing cars. obviously the tc caught my eye just for that reason design!!!!i mean what hasnt been done to honda already!!! i mean the euro lights and amongst other things were pretty much started by the honda/tunerz scene out there. i mean it got boring seeing everyone doing the same exact thing to there car then it spread to the suvees putting those freakin euro lights on. if you dont believe me just loo0k at the crx civic its got to be one the ugliest cars out there. the car just sreams river rice.. no offense but toyota didnt start the rice scene honda did.
http://cars.ign.com/articles/620/620651p3.html
lets all face it honda isnt quite a realiable car any more . quite as its kept honda has whats called a silent recall on honda accords, acura tl & cl for transmissions failures which is why i got rid of my tl. every 10,000 miles i was changing transmission and i got tired of it so i sold it after the last fix..i changed trannys at least 4 times and the service knew me on a first name bases
i do respect rsx onerz out there because i think its amazing that they can pump out 210 horses n.a but i not sure if thats at the wheels though....if it is at the wheels than thats amazing.the engine tech in hondas are amazing also hp per liter.
tc ownerz are ready to make a splash and pretty much forgot their manners.all i know is i hate it when im at a light and some honda/ricer wants to race. i just want to say to all KEEP IT ON THE TRACK OKAY!!!!
when i say boring im mean the overall design. i owned a couple of hondas and an an 99 acura tl to boot so there no freakin way im bias at all. i just think honda should stop going the same old route when designing cars. obviously the tc caught my eye just for that reason design!!!!i mean what hasnt been done to honda already!!! i mean the euro lights and amongst other things were pretty much started by the honda/tunerz scene out there. i mean it got boring seeing everyone doing the same exact thing to there car then it spread to the suvees putting those freakin euro lights on. if you dont believe me just loo0k at the crx civic its got to be one the ugliest cars out there. the car just sreams river rice.. no offense but toyota didnt start the rice scene honda did.
http://cars.ign.com/articles/620/620651p3.html
lets all face it honda isnt quite a realiable car any more . quite as its kept honda has whats called a silent recall on honda accords, acura tl & cl for transmissions failures which is why i got rid of my tl. every 10,000 miles i was changing transmission and i got tired of it so i sold it after the last fix..i changed trannys at least 4 times and the service knew me on a first name bases
i do respect rsx onerz out there because i think its amazing that they can pump out 210 horses n.a but i not sure if thats at the wheels though....if it is at the wheels than thats amazing.the engine tech in hondas are amazing also hp per liter.
tc ownerz are ready to make a splash and pretty much forgot their manners.all i know is i hate it when im at a light and some honda/ricer wants to race. i just want to say to all KEEP IT ON THE TRACK OKAY!!!!
the new Si hatch I had 2 years ago was insane.. insane quality of the interior, Recaro seats and MOMO steering wheel stock, awesome paint job (black with blue metallic flake in it), great ride, and overall wonderful quality. I actually just despised driving around in a car that got "RICE" screamed at me out the window a couple times a week.. it's a shame people have to be so bias against some cars, but, eh, I guess that's the way the world works. Oh yea and in the 1.5 years I had the car I never had to have it in once for any work other than routine maintenance. It was a bit on the sluggish side but it whipped up on a lot of cars once I got the DC header, Hondata reflash and K&N intake.. I was actually about ready to opt for the Greddy turbo but the instant I found out about the tC (several months before the car was sold) I planned on buying one.
Both cars have been great, and Honda in general does deserve a bit more credit, but I think why people really give Honda a lot of crap is because they're designed to be economy cars, not street racers. However, you can say the exact same thing of Toyota. So jesus everyone, all our cars are coming out of the same country here, so let's just be friends
Both cars have been great, and Honda in general does deserve a bit more credit, but I think why people really give Honda a lot of crap is because they're designed to be economy cars, not street racers. However, you can say the exact same thing of Toyota. So jesus everyone, all our cars are coming out of the same country here, so let's just be friends



