Notices
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
2005-2010 [ANT10]

TRD tC Supercharger release date and price!!! NO JOKE!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 08:01 PM
  #101  
Petem's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 371
Default

Originally Posted by cliffy1
Originally Posted by lowrightor
I would rather a port tech that installed hundreds of superchargers install mine rather than a dealership tech who has only done a handful. Cliffy?
I don't think that is a concern. I spoke to a couple of guys at CAT who had installed one. They said it was easier than they had expected. While the labor time is listed at 5 hours, it took them less than 2 hours and that was the first time they had laid hands on it. They felt it could be done in less than an hour once a person had done one or two.

The techs at the port really are no better than most dealership techs.
CLIFF here is a question.. maybe you can get an answer too... so far we have heard that there was suppose to be a piggy back engine management system with the SC... then there is not going to be one... and the ECU will be reflashed with the corrected mapping.. 'IF' you go and by the SC.. and install it yourself.. will the kit come with the reflasher or will the car have to be taken in to the dealer for reflashing..?
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 08:15 PM
  #102  
Kwiksilver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 266
From: The CA
Default

later on in the thread from the other message board that i linked to on the first page of this thread, it is stated that each dealer will have to buy 1 ecu reflasher and it costs $450 i think it is. but only one is needed so the customers won't be paying $450 on top of the sc installation or anything, but i bet they will secretly make it so each person getting the sc installed probably will pay for part of it in the install price, like maybe $10 a person or something like that. so that $450 reflasher is a problem if you want to install it yourself. and once again scion does what it can to put people at the mercy of dealer install prices.
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 08:36 PM
  #103  
cliffy1's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 526
From: Springfield Scion (VA)
Default

Originally Posted by Petem

CLIFF here is a question.. maybe you can get an answer too... so far we have heard that there was suppose to be a piggy back engine management system with the SC... then there is not going to be one... and the ECU will be reflashed with the corrected mapping.. 'IF' you go and by the SC.. and install it yourself.. will the kit come with the reflasher or will the car have to be taken in to the dealer for reflashing..?
Sorry, but I'm only technical enough to get my ___ into trouble and didn't know to ask that. With my DM, I doubt he would know anyway. I'll see what I can dig up, but you'll likely find a better answer from somedoby else on this.
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 04:01 AM
  #104  
Chaos_Being's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 327
From: Eldersburg/Sykesville, MD
Default

CONFIRMED!!!!!

I just got a phone call from my DM. I hadn't asked him about the memo on page 1 of this thread, but he quoted it verbatum, plus added a couple of extra details. The "over the counter" price will be $2700. The $3200 cost is the installed cost, although that's based on 5 hours labor and I know of very few dealerships that actually charge $100 per hour labor. Depending on the labor charges at the dealers, you are looking at $3000 to $3100 installed, with warranty.

Delivery time is September 1. I actually believe it now.
Well now, that's much better news, seeing as how I was hoping for around $3k installed. The TRD supercharger suddenly looks more appealing again!
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 09:26 AM
  #105  
user1234's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 102
Default

Originally Posted by kris79
have you been under a rock for the past 10 years? we have been pushing our cars to the limit. i been just shy of 500 whp on my integra. couple of my buddys have been able to get up to 600 something hp.

you saying s/c a i4 is stupid is kinda stupid, why s/c a v6 why not just buy a viper and tune that. s/c b18c5 will kill a s/c mustang v6 or a g35.

i could have went out and got a nsx if i liked, but i am not looking to pay 9k a year for my insurnace thats why i got a integra and turboed the crap out of it. yes if a nsx did the same things i did to my car it would be faster but most people wouldnt so as of rite now it cant touch me.

people fix up what they can afford dont go calling them stupid cause they cant afford a more expensive car.
completely agree with you, thay dude kwiksilver doesn't make any sense at all - stupid to turbocharge a 4 banger ?!?! most turbo's are on 4 cylinder engines like RSX-S, SRT4, WRX/STI, Cobalt SS, Audi A3/A4, VW Golf, Jetta, Passat, Saab 9-3/9-5, need I say more ? In fact most of then use 2.0L engines and get around 200-225 hp, but the ones that use 2.3-2.5L engines get 300 hp (SRT4, STI), so the TC with is 2.4L is a very good candidate for some serious turbocharged power.
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 06:00 PM
  #106  
rsx_freak79's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 701
From: Central Cali
Default

^^actually the rsx/rsx-s don't come w/ turbo or w/ a SC. it is stock at 210hp w/ no F/I. there are turbo kits and SC kits for the rsx but never has been a dealer option. and the cobalt SS is not turbo charged it's SC.
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 07:06 PM
  #107  
user1234's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 102
Default

Interesting, I just assumed the RSX-S is S/C or T/C cause it's the same engine size as the base RSX but has more hp. I wonder how they can get so much more out of the same engine...
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 07:10 PM
  #108  
Boricua's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 89
From: Washington DC
Default

Originally Posted by user1234
Interesting, I just assumed the RSX-S is S/C or T/C cause it's the same engine size as the base RSX but has more hp. I wonder how they can get so much more out of the same engine...
Higher compression ratio, better engine breathing (less restrictive airbox and exhaust) and some fine-tuning of the engine (VTEC). It's only 40 HP.

BTW, the Camaro SS and the Corvette had the same engine but a more restrictive air box on the Camaro gave it 30 less HP, if I'm not mistaken. That was the only difference.
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 09:04 PM
  #109  
Kwiksilver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 266
From: The CA
Default

Originally Posted by user1234
Interesting, I just assumed the RSX-S is S/C or T/C cause it's the same engine size as the base RSX but has more hp. I wonder how they can get so much more out of the same engine...
you assume a lot of things don't you? tc interior colors being different depending on the exterior color and now what cars are supercharged and turbocharged. you should get your facts straight for once before making "factual" statements. give it a try, i've heard that it works well.

here is something for everyone to consider. due to the price of the sc being high, maybe the question that should be asked is this: is there a car out there that produces 200-204 hp that can be bought for equal to, or less than, the price of the tc plus the supercharger?
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 09:13 PM
  #110  
darkknight's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10
From: Eugene, OR
Default

i rather buy a turbo, u can get one for same price or less and have 240whp @ 6psi
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 09:33 PM
  #111  
WildeScion's Avatar
Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36
From: Wilde Scion (WI)
Default

The info I received from my DM was that $3200 was MSRP plus install of 4-5 hours. Also was told the same....200+ hp, not defined further as to the crank or the wheels. Too bad the memo doesn't clue in the torque increase. Hopefully it'll be in the 225 ft/lb range. That would make the tC fly from a stop......Also, the release date mentioned to me was mid-late August.....so all you doubters out there, we have multiple dealers in various locations getting the same info. From my DM, sounds as if I will get about 5 in the initial order, where as smaller dealers will only get 2 or 3 to start.
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 09:41 PM
  #112  
corey415's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 101
Default

Originally Posted by Kwiksilver
here is something for everyone to consider. due to the price of the sc being high, maybe the question that should be asked is this: is there a car out there that produces 200-204 hp that can be bought for equal to, or less than, the price of the tc plus the supercharger?
So with the supercharger being around 3000, and the TC cost 16,500, the total price will be around 19500 to 20,000.

While pricing has not been set, the 06 Civic Si will come with 200hp NA, a six speed transmission, and an LSD. Current msrp for the Si is 19835, and I assume the 06 Si will probably be around the same price, most likely a little more. So that is another car to consider.

Also, while it isnt less than or equal to the 20,000 figure, the SRT4 is another model to consider; it can be bougt for under 21000 (before tax, title, ...).
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 09:59 PM
  #113  
itimebomb's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 192
From: Fowler Scion (OK)
Default

^^ that SI will have no torque like every other honda so that 200HP doesn't mean anything

the SRT4 is just a neon, and the cobalt SS is just a cavalier, both crappy crappy unsafe cars with horrible reliability and resale value. so spend your money how you want. but i try and trade people out of these pieces every day and it NEVER works. one dude was about 8K hooked in his EVO.

the port will not install this unit (and neither will the factory for that matter), just as they do not install the air intake and i believe the exhaust as well due to state EPA standards. while these parts pass EPA emission laws they still don't f*** with it. at least not down south.

and TRD does farm out much work and then make sure it works with the model, however this unit was built ground up from TRD with guidance from the japanese engineers. all i can say is a factory sponsored F/I part warranteed for 5yrs or 60K miles is pretty cool.
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 11:37 PM
  #114  
Liquid_R1's Avatar
Junior Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 19
From: San Jose
Default

Interesting... My SRT-4 hasn't had any problems... Yah, it's onlya Neon until you get beat... Then it's a SRT-4... :p
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 02:04 AM
  #115  
jiggydragon's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 110
From: Plano, TX
Default

so um i was wondering, is the warranty part of the engines warranty or does it add on, becuz im at like 15k right now and it ends at 30k, so whats the point in warranty if its only going to last another 6-8 months (if in actuality it does come out august or whenever) because it didnt take more then 6-8 months to rack up 15k on my car right now
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 03:32 AM
  #116  
boostedscion's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,236
From: Cali
Default

i can't wait
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 05:07 AM
  #117  
user1234's Avatar
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 102
Default

itimebomb, Chevy Cobalt IS NOT a Cavalier, it's a completely new car based on a gm's new delta platform. It is light years ahead of the cavalier, although it may not be the best in the compact class. The SS version with the supercharged 205 hp engine is probably faster then the tC would be with the TRD S/C.

So please cease with the trash talking, especially if you don't know the facts.
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 05:54 AM
  #118  
Milhamscion's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Team ScioNRG
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 873
From: Dick Milham Scion (PA)
Default

Originally Posted by jiggydragon
so um i was wondering, is the warranty part of the engines warranty or does it add on, becuz im at like 15k right now and it ends at 30k, so whats the point in warranty if its only going to last another 6-8 months (if in actuality it does come out august or whenever) because it didnt take more then 6-8 months to rack up 15k on my car right now
Actually you should have 5/60 on your powertrain. I imagine it would match that, or maybe 3/36??? Hopefully we will all know soon! I know alot of people that have been waiting a long time for this!!
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 07:58 AM
  #119  
rsx_freak79's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 701
From: Central Cali
Default

Originally Posted by itimebomb
^^ that SI will have no torque like every other honda so that 200HP doesn't mean anything
that's funny. my 200hp engine seems to be a big factor when i race every tc so far. and my car only has 142lbs of torque.
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 11:02 AM
  #120  
808tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 805
Default

i think that the purpose of getting a supercharger is to get more power, but why not get more with turbo......i would rather go a turbo set up and if the turbo messes up my car, i would take it back to the turbo place that sold me the item and argue that it broke my car......not to metion, pre-order turbo prices are cheaper and have more horsepower and torque than superchargers



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:57 AM.