Notices
Off-topic Cafe Meet the others and talk about whatever...
View Poll Results: Should abortions be legal???
Yes!!
68.24%
No!!
31.76%
Voters: 85. You may not vote on this poll

Abortion (debate)

Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:30 AM
  #281  
CLAPhoto's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 978
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by BigMURR
Originally Posted by BigMURR
Originally Posted by CLAPhoto
Okay.. there is so much to read and I am still reading it.

But I wanted to say one thing:

Thought not quite on the same level.. the basic idea is this.. it's the same as "___ marriages". Homosexual couples can do whatever the hell they want because it is their life. So what if you don't like seeing them walking along the street, holding hands or giving each other a kiss while waiting in line. You're going to see them doing that whether or not they are married. What they do with and how they live their lives is their business, NOT YOURS.

So the same goes with abortion.. if it's not YOUR body or YOUR fetus/baby/whatever.. then it is not YOUR business what the woman does. I know you can come out and say then it's not our business when a man commits murder.. but it's different. It's her body.. it's her life that may be in trouble, her body that may be in harm's way.. it's just not the public's business. If it's legal and you don't agree with it, then don't do it. That's your choice. If the fetus is never developed and given birth to, then what the hell is it missing out on if it was never born in the first place? (This is provided it's very early in the pregnancy.. there has to be a line at some point, but nobody can fairly say where to draw the line.)

And just as a side note.. don't come back on the ___ marriages thing and tell me that "the bible says".. if people are allowed to base this whole ___ marriage bull (because there shouldn't be an argument about it at all) on religion.. then I'm going to kill someone who deserves to be killed and say that "my bible says". We aren't allowed to blame our wrong doings on the bible or our religion when it comes to law.. and the same has to apply to ALL laws, not just criminal acts. You can't use religion to base your facts or arguments when it comes to things like this. You just can't.


But anyway.. that's my $.02. Back to reading the thread.
question when do you think the fetus becomes a baby???

and do you support sucide, meth, cocaine, cutting, etc., etc?
because really it's my body and according to you the law should not stop me.
oh man I forgot one thank for reminding me, do you think prostitution should be legal too because its your body you can do what you want with it.

I just want to get the head of these people and understand their logic, because it amazes me what they think.

No, I don't think it should be legal. But OTHER PEOPLE have to see it. You don't have to see a woman's aborted child or her body.. you can't point at a woman in the store and say, "She had an abortion.. boo hiss." Do you want your child walking along the street (see my last post before this) and seeing these women in their skanky clothes, selling themselves for sex? OTHER PEOPLE (keyword here).. see it.. in abortions.. OTHER PEOPLE.. do not.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:30 AM
  #282  
BigMURR's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scinergy
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,187
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

See the question I'm asking you is do you support it? I wasn't looking for an easy answer "well if they want to then they can do it" it seems you dont want to answer it or your not trying to make that hard decision. Yes or No.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:32 AM
  #283  
BigMURR's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scinergy
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,187
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

nevermind you answered it
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:35 AM
  #284  
CLAPhoto's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 978
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

I was just about to say I did say I don't support it.

I don't mean to be a b.tch or anything.. but there are certain people here whose line of thinking totally drives me off the walls. I'm sure the same goes for some of you for me and others.. but I just keep reading and keep replying and it just gets better and better.

Please don't think poorly of me for my opinion. I may call someone a dolt but I mean it in the most loving way I can possibly mean it.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:36 AM
  #285  
BigMURR's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scinergy
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,187
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

Originally Posted by CLAPhoto
Originally Posted by BigMURR
Originally Posted by BigMURR
Originally Posted by CLAPhoto
Okay.. there is so much to read and I am still reading it.

But I wanted to say one thing:

Thought not quite on the same level.. the basic idea is this.. it's the same as "___ marriages". Homosexual couples can do whatever the hell they want because it is their life. So what if you don't like seeing them walking along the street, holding hands or giving each other a kiss while waiting in line. You're going to see them doing that whether or not they are married. What they do with and how they live their lives is their business, NOT YOURS.

So the same goes with abortion.. if it's not YOUR body or YOUR fetus/baby/whatever.. then it is not YOUR business what the woman does. I know you can come out and say then it's not our business when a man commits murder.. but it's different. It's her body.. it's her life that may be in trouble, her body that may be in harm's way.. it's just not the public's business. If it's legal and you don't agree with it, then don't do it. That's your choice. If the fetus is never developed and given birth to, then what the hell is it missing out on if it was never born in the first place? (This is provided it's very early in the pregnancy.. there has to be a line at some point, but nobody can fairly say where to draw the line.)

And just as a side note.. don't come back on the ___ marriages thing and tell me that "the bible says".. if people are allowed to base this whole ___ marriage bull (because there shouldn't be an argument about it at all) on religion.. then I'm going to kill someone who deserves to be killed and say that "my bible says". We aren't allowed to blame our wrong doings on the bible or our religion when it comes to law.. and the same has to apply to ALL laws, not just criminal acts. You can't use religion to base your facts or arguments when it comes to things like this. You just can't.


But anyway.. that's my $.02. Back to reading the thread.
question when do you think the fetus becomes a baby???

and do you support sucide, meth, cocaine, cutting, etc., etc?
because really it's my body and according to you the law should not stop me.
oh man I forgot one thank for reminding me, do you think prostitution should be legal too because its your body you can do what you want with it.

I just want to get the head of these people and understand their logic, because it amazes me what they think.

No, I don't think it should be legal. But OTHER PEOPLE have to see it. You don't have to see a woman's aborted child or her body.. you can't point at a woman in the store and say, "She had an abortion.. boo hiss." Do you want your child walking along the street (see my last post before this) and seeing these women in their skanky clothes, selling themselves for sex? OTHER PEOPLE (keyword here).. see it.. in abortions.. OTHER PEOPLE.. do not.
but see what should we do about those who keep having more babies so they can get more welfare? We ALL have to see those kids and we ALL have to suffer the welfare costs. Maybe again like I said before take Seatledaves idea - "give them the abortion and then sterilize them with it"
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:37 AM
  #286  
CLAPhoto's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 978
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by BigMURR
Originally Posted by CLAPhoto
Originally Posted by BigMURR
Originally Posted by BigMURR
Originally Posted by CLAPhoto
Okay.. there is so much to read and I am still reading it.

But I wanted to say one thing:

Thought not quite on the same level.. the basic idea is this.. it's the same as "___ marriages". Homosexual couples can do whatever the hell they want because it is their life. So what if you don't like seeing them walking along the street, holding hands or giving each other a kiss while waiting in line. You're going to see them doing that whether or not they are married. What they do with and how they live their lives is their business, NOT YOURS.

So the same goes with abortion.. if it's not YOUR body or YOUR fetus/baby/whatever.. then it is not YOUR business what the woman does. I know you can come out and say then it's not our business when a man commits murder.. but it's different. It's her body.. it's her life that may be in trouble, her body that may be in harm's way.. it's just not the public's business. If it's legal and you don't agree with it, then don't do it. That's your choice. If the fetus is never developed and given birth to, then what the hell is it missing out on if it was never born in the first place? (This is provided it's very early in the pregnancy.. there has to be a line at some point, but nobody can fairly say where to draw the line.)

And just as a side note.. don't come back on the ___ marriages thing and tell me that "the bible says".. if people are allowed to base this whole ___ marriage bull (because there shouldn't be an argument about it at all) on religion.. then I'm going to kill someone who deserves to be killed and say that "my bible says". We aren't allowed to blame our wrong doings on the bible or our religion when it comes to law.. and the same has to apply to ALL laws, not just criminal acts. You can't use religion to base your facts or arguments when it comes to things like this. You just can't.


But anyway.. that's my $.02. Back to reading the thread.
question when do you think the fetus becomes a baby???

and do you support sucide, meth, cocaine, cutting, etc., etc?
because really it's my body and according to you the law should not stop me.
oh man I forgot one thank for reminding me, do you think prostitution should be legal too because its your body you can do what you want with it.

I just want to get the head of these people and understand their logic, because it amazes me what they think.

No, I don't think it should be legal. But OTHER PEOPLE have to see it. You don't have to see a woman's aborted child or her body.. you can't point at a woman in the store and say, "She had an abortion.. boo hiss." Do you want your child walking along the street (see my last post before this) and seeing these women in their skanky clothes, selling themselves for sex? OTHER PEOPLE (keyword here).. see it.. in abortions.. OTHER PEOPLE.. do not.
but see what should we do about those who keep having more babies so they can get more welfare? We ALL have to see those kids and we ALL have to suffer the welfare costs. Maybe again like I said before take Seatledaves idea - "give them the abortion and then sterilize them with it"

....I'm lost there. I couldn't tell you how to deal with them.. I never really thought about that. Don't they stop receving welfare after so long?
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:37 AM
  #287  
BigMURR's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scinergy
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,187
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

Originally Posted by CLAPhoto
I was just about to say I did say I don't support it.

I don't mean to be a b.tch or anything.. but there are certain people here whose line of thinking totally drives me off the walls. I'm sure the same goes for some of you for me and others.. but I just keep reading and keep replying and it just gets better and better.

Please don't think poorly of me for my opinion. I may call someone a dolt but I mean it in the most loving way I can possibly mean it.
haha no, some people would but I see it as a debate and the fights should stay there.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:38 AM
  #288  
BigMURR's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scinergy
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,187
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

I think they do stop getting welfare but like everythin there are ways to get around the system.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:47 AM
  #289  
CLAPhoto's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 978
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by BigMURR
I think they do stop getting welfare but like everythin there are ways to get around the system.
Yeah, kinda like my step dad and his ex getting divorced.. he had to get honorable discharge out of the military for losing half his foot and didn't make an income for a while and then finally got a job at some Motorcycle Shop for a bit (now works for gov't, his older kid dropped out, his younger is still in but only finishing so he can be in the military.. and otherwise has a very good life).. but he still had to pay child support, even though his ex wife made more than him.. because she didn't report her income as it actually was like she was supposed to, just said it was the same every time they asked. And their oldest son also was not in school but he was paying child support for him too.. until he confronted her and said that Michael is not in school and he does not have to pay for him if he is not in school.

And it's not like his ex needed the money. She remarried some guy with lots of money. She was just a.. well, you know.

So there are ways of getting around the system for pretty much everything, yeah.



Oh my goodness I can't type anymore. I'm so tired. I should go to bed.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:49 AM
  #290  
BigMURR's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scinergy
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,187
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

Originally Posted by CLAPhoto
Originally Posted by BigMURR
I think they do stop getting welfare but like everythin there are ways to get around the system.
Yeah, kinda like my step dad and his ex getting divorced.. he had to get honorable discharge out of the military for losing half his foot and didn't make an income for a while and then finally got a job at some Motorcycle Shop for a bit.. but he still had to pay child support, even though his ex wife made more than him.. because she didn't report her income asi t actually was like she was supposed to, just said it was the same every time they asked. And their oldest son also was not in school but he was paying child support for him too.. until he confronted her and said that Michael is not in school and he does not have to pay for him if he is not in school.

And it's not like his ex needed the money. She remarried some guy with lots of money. She was just a.. well, you know.

So there are ways of getting around the system for pretty much everything, yeah.



Oh my goodness I can't type anymore. I'm so tired. I should go to bed.
haha holy crap I just woke up
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:51 AM
  #291  
CLAPhoto's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 978
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by draxcaliber
i didn't vote for bush, i don't support the war in iraq, and i drive a car bult in japan. does that mean i'm not american?

i have lots of jewish friends who eat pork and shell fish, are the no longer jewish?

i think i proved yet another point.

Wow! I was so into this thread, that I got to, "I drive a car built in Japan."

I was about to reply and go, "Really!? Me too! I drive a Scion xA.. what do you drive?"

Rofl. Jeeze. I totally forgot what forum I was on. I'm also very tired and really have to pee.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 11:54 AM
  #292  
CLAPhoto's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 978
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

I'm out.. I so need to go to sleep. Be back later! Cause I'm a
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 04:27 PM
  #293  
seattledave's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,703
Default

Originally Posted by CLAPhoto
What's with the no diabetics? I'm diabetic.. so I shouldn't be able to have kids? wtf is that supposed to mean?
i meant for a perfect world. I know there is alot of news about how "mysteriously" type 1 diabetes is going way up since the early 1900s. Know why? Insulin. Diabetics would have died before they could even have kids, 100 years ago. So let's say if insulin hadn't been invented, or only given to those who weren't fertile. We'd have a 1000th of the diabetics we now have. Look, my mom is diabetic, my step mom is too, I'm not preaching the end to breeding for diabetics now, but hypothetically if i was a scientist working on the human species, that's what I'd come up with.

Medicine is great, but if it negatively impacts natural selection, it isn't doing it's job.
(to me, natural selection has been the #1 reason life has been able to live on this evolving planet for the last 3 billion years)
Medicine should be for cures, or to keep the sick living longer. It shouldn't be there to help increase the percentage of genetic defects in the human species.

I think we need to get past having children born with easily solvable birth defects. We're not anywhere close to a cure for type 1 diabetes. Just like we're not anywhere close to solving hypo-thyroid problems. Say someone is born with no reproductive organs, should we allow science to extract dna from the guy just so he could reproduce? Maybe, but only if we're low on human beings, but we're not, we're no were close.

I don't want to go so far as to have something like in that movie gattaca, but if it's easy to breed out genetic defects, i think we should do it. and like it's been said, if people NEED to have a child family, there are thousands of kids who needs adopting.

I'm in the boat where I think the world has like 3 times too many people as it should.
I am all about getting to becoming a naturally sustained world, where humans find an equilibrium with the planet, So we don't have to tear down every rainforest for cattle and corn, and where americans aren't robbing india for drinking water.

Who's seen Idicrocy? They show a well off, very above average intelligence couple who after years of being together, decide to have one kid, but only right after they finish up their education. But then they extend it, and they don't end up having a child. But joe-blow watching jerry springer has like 10, and they all grow up ignorant and not quit able to properly feed themselves. That is the world we're coming to, just letting anyone breed for fun.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 04:40 PM
  #294  
Tito_Cruz's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 761
From: Coke-a-Cola, SC
Default

Originally Posted by seattledave
Originally Posted by CLAPhoto
What's with the no diabetics? I'm diabetic.. so I shouldn't be able to have kids? wtf is that supposed to mean?
i meant for a perfect world. I know there is alot of news about how "mysteriously" type 1 diabetes is going way up since the early 1900s. Know why? Insulin. Diabetics would have died before they could even have kids, 100 years ago. So let's say if insulin hadn't been invented, or only given to those who weren't fertile. We'd have a 1000th of the diabetics we now have. Look, my mom is diabetic, my step mom is too, I'm not preaching the end to breeding for diabetics now, but hypothetically if i was a scientist working on the human species, that's what I'd come up with.

Medicine is great, but if it negatively impacts natural selection, it isn't doing it's job.
(to me, natural selection has been the #1 reason life has been able to live on this evolving planet for the last 3 billion years)
Medicine should be for cures, or to keep the sick living longer. It shouldn't be there to help increase the percentage of genetic defects in the human species.

I think we need to get past having children born with easily solvable birth defects. We're not anywhere close to a cure for type 1 diabetes. Just like we're not anywhere close to solving hypo-thyroid problems. Say someone is born with no reproductive organs, should we allow science to extract dna from the guy just so he could reproduce? Maybe, but only if we're low on human beings, but we're not, we're no were close.

I don't want to go so far as to have something like in that movie gattaca, but if it's easy to breed out genetic defects, i think we should do it. and like it's been said, if people NEED to have a child family, there are thousands of kids who needs adopting.

I'm in the boat where I think the world has like 3 times too many people as it should.
I am all about getting to becoming a naturally sustained world, where humans find an equilibrium with the planet, So we don't have to tear down every rainforest for cattle and corn, and where americans aren't robbing india for drinking water.

Who's seen Idicrocy? They show a well off, very above average intelligence couple who after years of being together, decide to have one kid, but only right after they finish up their education. But then they extend it, and they don't end up having a child. But joe-blow watching jerry springer has like 10, and they all grow up ignorant and not quit able to properly feed themselves. That is the world we're coming to, just letting anyone breed for fun.
You prove a very good point. Just doesn't reflect my morals.

Verry gooood point.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 06:55 PM
  #295  
evilBOXevil's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 616
From: Kitchen Stadium
Default

Oh this thread is too goofy!!
I see that people are actually quoting bible scripture now! Yeah, lets base our country around bible scriptures...and maybe someday we can drive out the infidels who refuse to honor our god!! We must drive them from the earth! Maybe we can someday have suicide bombers who will martyr themselves to the cause of the holy battle to cleanse our land of sin!!

^^Start quoting bible scriptures and use them as a basis for how to make laws, and the craziness stated above starts to seem almost possible, doesn't it?

Yeah, it sucks- but we have this goofy little thing called "Separation of church and state". Annoying as it may be- it's there, O righteous people.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 06:59 PM
  #296  
seattledave's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,703
Default

Originally Posted by evilBOXevil
we have this goofy little thing called "Separation of church and state". Annoying as it may be- it's there, O righteous people.
wish our elected officals knew this. Why isn't stem cell research legal?
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 07:12 PM
  #297  
evilBOXevil's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 616
From: Kitchen Stadium
Default

With the current people running the show, I think the idea is:
If it's not profitable for us, then it's not what a 'Christian' man should ever consider.
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 07:14 PM
  #298  
CLAPhoto's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 978
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by seattledave
Originally Posted by evilBOXevil
we have this goofy little thing called "Separation of church and state". Annoying as it may be- it's there, O righteous people.
wish our elected officals knew this. Why isn't stem cell research legal?
Like I said.. if a man can not justify his actions by the bible to defend himself in court.. then why should the people who run this country be allowed to say, "Well the bible said...." when it comes to law making? It's hypocritical. And like evilBOXevil said.. we have this thing called separation of church and state. It's not there for you to just sit and look at.


How many of you support stem cell research, but not abortion? How many of you support abortion but not stem cell research. Why? According to our government and many residents of our wonderful country, allowing us to do stem cell research means we have to kill babies! (Though seems they've found a way to do it without killing an embryo._ But.. if someone wants to abort their not-yet-born child, then why not allow said not-yet-born child be used for stem cell research rather than just throw it in the dumpster out back?

It's a potential cure for a lot of things.


People have said it a million times.. abortion is not black and white. It's way beyond. And nobody will ever have the same opinion or view on the matter.. so I guess just keep getting smarter by reading the interesting posts on this thread.

Or maybe getting dumber, since I guess the voting age isn't 18 already...
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 07:29 PM
  #299  
BigMURR's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
Scinergy
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,187
From: Kennesaw, GA
Default

stems cells can be harvested from the embilical cord fyi
Old Mar 8, 2007 | 07:31 PM
  #300  
CLAPhoto's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 978
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by BigMURR
stems cells can be harvested from the embilical cord fyi
Ah, thank you. Must be one of the things I've read and forgotten.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:35 PM.