Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...
View Poll Results: turbo you would choose
ptuning
66.06%
dezod
20.18%
descendant
16.51%
greddy
7.34%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll

ptuning....turbo kit, etc.... DYNO SHEET pg.39

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:48 AM
  #461  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonXe
Direct quote from the article, in case you're still to ____ing stupid to understand.

should I repeat myself.

I went from 6 PSI Pump gas to 8 PSI Pump gas w/ 100% Meth not 50% meth. I'm not saying that the 100% meth quadrooples the normal outcome but in my case it added a lot more torque

you are an idiot.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:50 AM
  #462  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

That's it, I'm through, you're bench racing against a car that doesn't even exist.

Thank you for wasting my time. I was hoping you would actually open your eyes and read the article, but I guess you're too blind by your false numbers at this point.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:50 AM
  #463  
Ace83's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,117
From: TX
Default

He has proven his point of what he think.. He has the best tuner ever, his tuner is the tuning god, the torque master.. anyone that questions the numbers knows less and would need to call his tuner to get schooled.. seriously no one can question this thought, that is firm and wont change.. its cool lets leave at that. 2 more psi he would be around 400s at 12 psi it would be 500.. 100% methanol that is.

Oh If I would be on same situation, I wouldnt not preach on what my tuner has said.. I might get ____ed with the tuner until I proved his tune was right on.. like same as other comparable dyno.. thats just me.. but im ignorant coz I doubt his numbers from info presented
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:50 AM
  #464  
game-over's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,043
From: York, PA
Default

zz

Last edited by game-over; Sep 17, 2009 at 03:45 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:51 AM
  #465  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by dodaddy
should I repeat myself.

I went from 6 PSI Pump gas to 8 PSI Pump gas w/ 100% Meth not 50% meth. I'm not saying that the 100% meth quadrooples the normal outcome but in my case it added a lot more torque

you are an idiot.
No, you're not saying that going from a 50% to 100% mixture "quadrooples" the efficiency. You're trying to say that it increases it by about 900%.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:51 AM
  #466  
Ace83's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,117
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonXe
That's it, I'm through, you're bench racing against a car that doesn't even exist.

Thank you for wasting my time. I was hoping you would actually open your eyes and read the article, but I guess you're too blind by your false numbers at this point.
hey Im just posting to up my post lmao.. its entertaining, kinda reminds me with the talks Ive had with my friends in kindergarten
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:52 AM
  #467  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

My tuner is not the best tuner by no means, nor did I claim he was, but he is a great tuner compared to the tuners that I have had tuned my car int he past. Don't put words in my mouth, especially since you're one of the ignorant ones as well.

Maybe your jealousy or ego is not letting you believe my numbers but thats not my problem. Or you're just mad becuase you spent a lot more money than I did to get numbers you werent happy with.

I hate having to repeat myself again and again when you guys aren't listening.

if you don't believe me, contact my tuner, or tell me what questions to ask him. Logically if you think you are a tuner or you are a tuner, or think you know how to, you'd want to know how to get these numbers, obviously your ego's are getting in your way and are getting crushed because of my great dyno readings, that it is making you scared of knowing how to achieve these numbers by talking to my tuner.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:55 AM
  #468  
game-over's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,043
From: York, PA
Default

zz

Last edited by game-over; Sep 17, 2009 at 03:45 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:55 AM
  #469  
blown_xa's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,902
From: PTuning
Default

Originally Posted by dodaddy
to get back on topic....

CarbonXE already got owned by rob_descendant because he can't explain why the descendant kit is no good, and then got owned by me because he can't admit to being wrong about methanol injection. You are definitely not on the bright side, you can't even bring up facts to prove yourself. Learn to debate. And your S2K wouldn't stand a chance against my tc.

Also I agree with Domo on his earlier posts..

People need to stop joining the banwagon and actually research the product before they buy it. Ptuning might be all hype, my greddy kit is putting down more power than most of ptuning turbo kit users. I'm waiting for Toan to post the flaw in the dyno sheet so i can get an understanding of why no one believes me. Of course I will forward it onto my tuner and we'll go from there.

i see the flaw but ill let Toan explain it. I believe your vehicle was tuned via road speed instead of actual rpm signal, and the calibration was off
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:58 AM
  #470  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

^^ i have no idea what that means but I am open to hear what that means if it is a flaw in the dyno sheet. And I will ask my tuner if that is the case if Toan thinks so too.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 02:00 AM
  #471  
ecko04's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,243
From: Atlanta/Charlotte/Auburn
Default

This thread has become more and more epic in nature.

It was an epic in the beginning with the ptuning v dezod debate that seems to have carried on into other threads now the factious dyno and the ability for 1 person to believe his inflated chart vs tons of others @ 8psi and say because he runs meth at such and such a low amount of boost it made the 140wtq difference and that ptuning should fire their tuner because he isn't as big a stud as the torque god that has descended into Oregon for the dododaddy tC.

Old Sep 17, 2009 | 02:01 AM
  #472  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

This coming from the Alcohol/Methanol/Water Injection Q&A... Thread.. https://www.scionlife.com/forums/sho...=97687&page=13 of another Methanol Injection user..


-Stock = 150.71/154.71ftlbs
-Low Boost - 7psi = 256.67whp/250.87ftlbs
-High Boost - 12psi (with methanol)
317.37whp/334.35ftlbs Meth comes in at 7psi


http://importsnc.com/forums/national...bocharged.html
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 02:02 AM
  #473  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

So you paid less than $1300 for your entire turbo kit, exhaust and tune? Because that's how much I paid for. Oh, you didn't know...that's right, I paid $0 for my brand new turbo kit, $900 for my exhaust, and $400 for my tune. So $1300 for +145whp, not bad. Isn't the Greddy kit around $2800? Isn't $1300<$2800? Doesn't adding the tuning session, the meth kit, exhaust, etc add onto the $2800 of the Greddy kit? Yes, I believe it does.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 02:03 AM
  #474  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

^^ how many times are you going to say that are you done with this conversation? I've already determined that you're an idiot, and you should stop digging yourself in a hole deeper than you already are with your little knowledge of cars.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 02:04 AM
  #475  
blown_xa's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,902
From: PTuning
Default

Originally Posted by dodaddy
^^ i have no idea what that means but I am open to hear what that means if it is a flaw in the dyno sheet. And I will ask my tuner if that is the case if Toan thinks so too.
yea i could very well be wrong, but ive sat in on some tunes and pulls. Ill let the kung fu master chime in.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 02:07 AM
  #476  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by blown_xa
yea i could very well be wrong, but ive sat in on some tunes and pulls. Ill let the kung fu master chime in.
I'm open to hear anything as to why my numbers might be false, but again there has to be facts to prove it, and I would be more than happy to share what people on this forum have to say and why they believe he's wrong, so he could at least get a chance to explain himself.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 02:11 AM
  #477  
DJ08tC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 6,159
From: Spotsylvania, VA
Default

this thread is
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 02:12 AM
  #478  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by dodaddy
^^ how many times are you going to say that are you done with this conversation? I've already determined that you're an idiot, and you should stop digging yourself in a hole deeper than you already are with your little knowledge of cars.
Yes, my little knowledge of cars. I guess that's why I graduated at the top of my class from UTI with a 4.0 GPA and graduated from Ford FACT training with all 13 certifications. Yes, my little knowledge.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 02:13 AM
  #479  
game-over's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,043
From: York, PA
Default

zz

Last edited by game-over; Sep 17, 2009 at 03:45 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 02:14 AM
  #480  
ecko04's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fresh Crew
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,243
From: Atlanta/Charlotte/Auburn
Default

Originally Posted by dodaddy
This coming from the Alcohol/Methanol/Water Injection Q&A... Thread.. https://www.scionlife.com/forums/sho...=97687&page=13 of another Methanol Injection user..


-Stock = 150.71/154.71ftlbs
-Low Boost - 7psi = 256.67whp/250.87ftlbs
-High Boost - 12psi (with methanol)
317.37whp/334.35ftlbs Meth comes in at 7psi


http://importsnc.com/forums/national...bocharged.html
You do realize those numbers are on a DYNOJET correct.

So lets bring those back down to reality -13%



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:33 PM.