Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...
View Poll Results: turbo you would choose
ptuning
66.06%
dezod
20.18%
descendant
16.51%
greddy
7.34%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll

ptuning....turbo kit, etc.... DYNO SHEET pg.39

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 12:52 AM
  #421  
ElevationTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,156
From: Orlando, FL
Default



So i took a trip to his tuner in disbelief! AND OMG!!!

DAWWGGGSS CHEKKK OUT MY PQWA!

straight meth look at the powaa!

no race gas! this guy is a TQ MASTTTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 12:53 AM
  #422  
PTUNING's Avatar
Former Sponsor
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,012
Default

dodaddy,

My technical knowledge is not anywhere near the level of MrC or Toan. So, I feel like I can respond to the post with a calm head.

SL community in general is much more educated about force induction then they were, let say 1-2 years ago. So, anything that is out of the ordinary, we be questioned. Maybe the approach is not so refine at time. So, don't take it the wrong way.

I can assured you there is nothing to be gain for Toan to contact your tuner. I think what everyone is asking is for your tuner to give more technical details on how he was able to achieve these great numbers. Once everyone is satisfy with the technical explanation, hell, he may become the hottest commodity on the Scion tC market. Honestly, there is nothing to loose and everything to gain for your tuner. Again, this is assuming that everything makes sense to the general public.

Regards,
Mike @ PTUNING
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 12:54 AM
  #423  
jwaggz82's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,259
From: Earth
Default

lol - toan/mrC tell him what your average hp levels are on 8lbs with that kit/dezods kit/your kit

give us an average.

dodaddy .....wait and see how much lower the numbers are (his dyno is very conservative). he is going to say prob 245-255whp and trq
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 12:55 AM
  #424  
game-over's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,043
From: York, PA
Default

zz

Last edited by game-over; Sep 17, 2009 at 03:48 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 12:56 AM
  #425  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

^^ I've asked my tuner to log onto the forums but I don't know if he'll get a chance to actually post up and explain. I don't know what questions I would ask my tuner in order for everyone to gain an understanding of his tuning method.

I'm not here to call anyone bad tuners or anything especially ptuning, but what I'm saying is that people are being ignorant and not knowing the full side of things before coming to a conclusion as to if my numbers are real or fake. If I knew what questions to ask, or if someone actually asked me a valid question like which gear did I do the pull in, I can ask him, but other than that I wouldn't know what else to ask.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 12:57 AM
  #426  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by jwaggz82
lol - toan/mrC tell him what your average hp levels are on 8lbs with that kit/dezods kit/your kit

give us an average.

dodaddy .....wait and see how much lower the numbers are (his dyno is very conservative). he is going to say prob 245-255whp and trq
you must of missed a huge part of this thread.. my car is running 100% methanol injection, so that average is not going to do any good. The methanol shoots right before the throttle body.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 12:58 AM
  #427  
jwaggz82's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member

SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,259
From: Earth
Default

ok good - so add 25hp to those numbers - its your trq we are calling you on - not the hp
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:00 AM
  #428  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

^^ another ignorant post from you. SOunds like you might be one of those guys that buy a part and assume that since it says adds 10hp you believe it. Grow up.

Here's a writeup from modified.com. They are running 50/50 meth, not 100% like myself and they were able to go from 378.8 whp/294 tq to 426 whp/341 tq with adding about 3 psi. Maybe they are fluffing there numbers too.

http://www.modified.com/tech/modp-09...kit/apexi.html
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:02 AM
  #429  
game-over's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,043
From: York, PA
Default

zz

Last edited by game-over; Sep 17, 2009 at 03:49 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:03 AM
  #430  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by dodaddy
^^ another ignorant post from you. SOunds like you might be one of those guys that buy a part and assume that since it says adds 10hp you believe it. Grow up.
And you believe meth injections doubles your power.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:03 AM
  #431  
coryjames's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,024
From: Arvada, CO
Default

so you jsut proved why your numbers are so high done
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:08 AM
  #432  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by game-over
you missed a huge part of this thread....
this was a ptunning thread... and you had to ____ it up with you greddy ____.....
but this is pretty entertaining...

but again... thank you for jacking my thread
Originally Posted by game-over
so any comments, experiences, pics, dyno sheets, videos, what ever....

greddy was part of the poll so i figured i might as well post my dyno sheet since you even said post up on your first post.

I can keep proving people wrong but it takes a man to admit they were. CarbonXe and Cory james the last posts from you guys just shows your still ignorant and not willing to learn, especially since i posted a write up and review from modified.com You guys probably just realized that you were wrong and now can't even admit to it, but whatever, i don't care. I'm more in this debate to prove that my numbers are real and my tuner is legit, not to build my ego and self esteem of off people who admit there wrong to me, or people who can't admit.

Last edited by dodaddy; Sep 17, 2009 at 01:13 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:12 AM
  #433  
game-over's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,043
From: York, PA
Default

zz

Last edited by game-over; Sep 17, 2009 at 03:49 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:14 AM
  #434  
game-over's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,043
From: York, PA
Default

zz

Last edited by game-over; Sep 17, 2009 at 03:49 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:15 AM
  #435  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by dodaddy
^^ another ignorant post from you. SOunds like you might be one of those guys that buy a part and assume that since it says adds 10hp you believe it. Grow up.

Here's a writeup from modified.com. They are running 50/50 meth, not 100% like myself and they were able to go from 378.8 whp/294 tq to 426 whp/341 tq with adding about 3 psi. Maybe they are fluffing there numbers too.

http://www.modified.com/tech/modp-09...kit/apexi.html
Thank you for proving PTuning right.

20 PSI BEFORE METH : 378.8 whp and 294.1 ft-lbs
23 PSI AFTER METH : 426.6 whp and 341.0 ft-lbs

341 - 294.1 = 46.9
46.9/3 = 15.6

They gained 15.6WTQ/PSI, ON TOP of the meth injection.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:16 AM
  #436  
coryjames's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,024
From: Arvada, CO
Default

dodaddy I love you. You made my day
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:16 AM
  #437  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

Either way, a lot of people on this thread assume they are tuners and know everything when they don't. Especially since methanol is involved, that changes all variables.

Good luck with finding the right kit, if my tuner comes on here I will have him post probably on a new thread of how he tuned my car, and I apologize for threadjacking.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:18 AM
  #438  
game-over's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,043
From: York, PA
Default

zz

Last edited by game-over; Sep 17, 2009 at 03:49 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:18 AM
  #439  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonXe
Thank you for proving PTuning right.

20 PSI BEFORE METH : 378.8 whp and 294.1 ft-lbs
23 PSI AFTER METH : 426.6 whp and 341.0 ft-lbs

341 - 294.1 = 46.9
46.9/3 = 15.6

They gained 15.6WTQ/PSI, ON TOP of the meth injection.

Maybe you are illiterate or just don't ge tit..

WITH INJECTION KIT AT 1.4 BAR GAINS MADE + 31.5 hp + 25.4 torque BEFORE 378.8 whp and 294.1 ft-lbs AFTER 410.3 whp and 319.5 ft-lbs WITH INJECTION KIT AT 1.6 BAR GAINS MADE + 16.3 hp + 21.5 torque BEFORE 410.3 whp and 319.5 ft-lbs AFTER 426.6 whp and 341.0 ft-lbs

The first dyno reading was no methanol involved. 378 whp/294tq similar gains to my tune.

And with your screwed up logic, and not listening to what I said earlier.. every tuner is different and has there own tuning niche. My tuner is awesome at getting torque and tuning with methanol.. not every tuner is good at that.

Last edited by dodaddy; Sep 17, 2009 at 01:26 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:18 AM
  #440  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

It's a smaller motor, with a smaller turbo right in that turbos efficiency range. Like PTuning said, roughly 10hp/tq per PSI is typical, they gained 15TQ per PSI with the 50/50. That means they only gained 5WTQ per PSI from the meth injection. Since you're running 100%, let's QUADUPLE that number. 5WTQ*400% = 20WTQ. 20WTQ*2PSI = 40WTQ. That's still 60WTQ less than you're claiming, and I'm 104% sure that going from 50/50 to 100% will not increase the efficiency of meth injection by 400%.



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32 AM.