Notices
Scion tC 1G Forced Induction Turbo and supercharger applications...
View Poll Results: turbo you would choose
ptuning
66.06%
dezod
20.18%
descendant
16.51%
greddy
7.34%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 109. You may not vote on this poll

ptuning....turbo kit, etc.... DYNO SHEET pg.39

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:20 AM
  #441  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by game-over
here is my first post.....




what is so hard about that post.....
where does it say... any one with greddy, dezod, or descendant... i want your experiances.
come on... you have over 1,700 post... so i know you can read......

Maybe you can't understand your own post. It says....

"i was hoping the product and end result will sell itself.
so any comments, experiences, pics, dyno sheets, videos, what ever...."


Where does it say that you only want ptuning dyno sheets? According to your post it says ANY comments, pics, dyno sheets or whatever.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:21 AM
  #442  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by dodaddy
Maybe you are illiterate or just don't ge tit..

WITH INJECTION KIT AT 1.4 BAR GAINS MADE + 31.5 hp + 25.4 torque BEFORE 378.8 whp and 294.1 ft-lbs AFTER 410.3 whp and 319.5 ft-lbs WITH INJECTION KIT AT 1.6 BAR GAINS MADE + 16.3 hp + 21.5 torque BEFORE 410.3 whp and 319.5 ft-lbs AFTER 426.6 whp and 341.0 ft-lbs

The first dyno reading was no methanol involved. 378 whp/294tq
Maybe you're the one who is illiterate, because you just read my post and said the exact same thing I said. I specifically said 20PSI BEFORE meth, then 23PSI AFTER. I took their lowest reading, which was the lowest boost without meth, and compared it to their highest reading, which was the higher boost level with meth.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:21 AM
  #443  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonXe
It's a smaller motor, with a smaller turbo right in that turbos efficiency range. Like PTuning said, roughly 10hp/tq per PSI is typical, they gained 15TQ per PSI with the 50/50. That means they only gained 5WTQ per PSI from the meth injection. Since you're running 100%, let's QUADUPLE that number. 5WTQ*400% = 20WTQ. 20WTQ*2PSI = 40WTQ. That's still 60WTQ less than you're claiming, and I'm 104% sure that going from 50/50 to 100% will not increase the efficiency of meth injection by 400%.

You must not be able to read. I will explain to you the result in a way you might be able to understand... They gained 48whp/47 tq with running 50/50 meth.

And i went from 6 PSI NO meth to 8 PSI, 100% meth on my retune. The numbers are fairly similar to the writeup.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:26 AM
  #444  
Ptuning_tuner's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 132
From: Manassas, VA
Default

Originally Posted by game-over
There appears to be flaws in the way the dyno pull was conducted. I'll post an explanation here shortly. I figured since so many of you are still on the boards right now, I'd give you all heads up.

- Toan
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:28 AM
  #445  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Forget it. I'm done. I'm not going to bother.

Last edited by CarbonXe; Sep 17, 2009 at 01:33 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:28 AM
  #446  
Domo's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,006
From: Earth
Default

Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:29 AM
  #447  
game-over's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,043
From: York, PA
Default

zz

Last edited by game-over; Sep 17, 2009 at 03:46 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:30 AM
  #448  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonXe
I'll try to do this for you again since you refused to believe me the first time, then continued to insult my reading comprehension, simply because you're too blind to realize that I'm right.


WITH INJECTION KIT AT 1.4 BAR GAINS MADE + 31.5 hp + 25.4 torque BEFORE 378.8 whp and 294.1 ft-lbs AFTER 410.3 whp and 319.5 ft-lbs

WITH INJECTION KIT AT 1.6 BAR GAINS MADE + 16.3 hp + 21.5 torque BEFORE 410.3 whp and 319.5 ft-lbs AFTER 426.6 whp and 341.0 ft-lbs
Note: I'm using the LOW BOOST NO METH numbers and the HIGH BOOST WITH METH numbers.

341 - 294.1 = 46.9
46.9/3 = 15.6

They gained 15.6WTQ/PSI, ON TOP of the meth injection.



Now, I want you to realize somehting. They did gain about 50whp/50wtq after the meth was added. BUT THEY ALSO INCREASED THE BOOST BY 3 PSI.

What does that mean?

THEY DID NOT GAIN 50WHP/WTQ FROM METH ALONE. FURTHER MEANING THAT IF YOU TAKE THE TYPICAL 10WHP/PSI OUT OF THE EQUATION, THE METH HAD MINOR EFFECTS.
I think i mentioned a few times alreayd, i went from 6 psi non meth injected to 8psi meth injecected.. yes you need to work on your reading and comprehension.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:31 AM
  #449  
game-over's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,043
From: York, PA
Default

zz

Last edited by game-over; Sep 17, 2009 at 03:46 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:31 AM
  #450  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

"so the reason for this thread... TWAN and CHRIS basically sold me on their shop and there parts, but thats their job.
i was hoping the product and end result will sell itself.
so any comments, experiences, pics, dyno sheets, videos, what ever...."

where does it say in this paragraph ptuning dyno sheets only.. i read hte thread title but the topic doesnt say ONLY post ptuning info....

Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:36 AM
  #451  
Ace83's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Ronin Scion
SL Member
Premium Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,117
From: TX
Default

i like turbos
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:37 AM
  #452  
game-over's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,043
From: York, PA
Default

zz

Last edited by game-over; Sep 17, 2009 at 03:46 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:38 AM
  #453  
silverbullet89's Avatar
Senior Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 314
From: southern md
Default

turbos make my car go pshhhhhh
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:38 AM
  #454  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by dodaddy
I think i mentioned a few times alreayd, i went from 6 psi non meth injected to 8psi meth injecected.. yes you need to work on your reading and comprehension.
According the article, he couldn't break 400whp on pump gas.
According to his dyno, his baseline was 379/294.
His baseline = pump gas = 379/294.

Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:39 AM
  #455  
silverbullet89's Avatar
Senior Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 314
From: southern md
Default

p tuning ftw
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:40 AM
  #456  
game-over's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,043
From: York, PA
Default

zz

Last edited by game-over; Sep 17, 2009 at 03:46 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:41 AM
  #457  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

And I think I mentioned a few times already, that 240 went from 20 psi non-meth to 23psi meth. THE SAME SITUATION AS YOU! GASP!
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:43 AM
  #458  
game-over's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,043
From: York, PA
Default

zz

Last edited by game-over; Sep 17, 2009 at 03:46 AM.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:43 AM
  #459  
dodaddy's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,800
From: Portland, OR
Default

to get back on topic....

CarbonXE already got owned by rob_descendant because he can't explain why the descendant kit is no good, and then got owned by me because he can't admit to being wrong about methanol injection. You are definitely not on the bright side, you can't even bring up facts to prove yourself. Learn to debate. And your S2K wouldn't stand a chance against my tc.

Also I agree with Domo on his earlier posts..

People need to stop joining the banwagon and actually research the product before they buy it. Ptuning might be all hype, my greddy kit is putting down more power than most of ptuning turbo kit users. I'm waiting for Toan to post the flaw in the dyno sheet so i can get an understanding of why no one believes me. Of course I will forward it onto my tuner and we'll go from there.
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 01:45 AM
  #460  
CarbonXe's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
teamNJCT
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16,638
From: Parsippany, NJ
Default

Direct quote from the article, in case you're still to ____ing stupid to understand.

We installed our kit into a '97 SR20DET-equipped Nissan 240SX. The motor had already been built, and the turbo and plumbing had already been upgraded to Blitz hardware. Unfortunately, the Blitz turbo struggled to get past the 400-whp mark (using pump gas and 1.4 bar of boost) on Driftspeed's conservative Dynapack Dynamometer.



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31 AM.