Atheist vs Theist (Debate)
Whoa... This thread got ugly quick. Kahuna, you thought it was soooo funny that your question was supposedly not answered or whatever you said and I challenged you to ask another and you still haven't. Since nothing is coming of the bickering above this post I challenge you to ask a question that the rest of us can run with and change the conversational topic to one that will actually lead somewhere.
Originally Posted by HeathenBrewing
Originally Posted by krustytheclown
You gotta understand though, An Evolutionist dosen't need to have all the answers and everything is ok. But if a Creationist dosent have all the answers, then that proves that we are wrong.
Evolutionist say that for now, theory 'X' is what we believe, but we can easily drop said theory when it is shown to be incorrect.
That is the difference and a huge one at that.
Originally Posted by backseatchris
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
Originally Posted by backseatchris
i think any person would be an idiot if god could be proven beyond a reasonable doubt and they still didnt believe. is that too unreasonable?
God wouldnt have to force anyone to do anything they didnt want. But like a good person taking care of an ant farm, it is nice for the caretaker to stop by every once and a while to say hi to everyone, and add some new soil or something we can physically use in order to give a genuine "thank you"
I'm confused.
Originally Posted by HeathenBrewing
Originally Posted by krustytheclown
You gotta understand though, An Evolutionist dosen't need to have all the answers and everything is ok. But if a Creationist dosent have all the answers, then that proves that we are wrong.
Evolutionist say that for now, theory 'X' is what we believe, but we can easily drop said theory when it is shown to be incorrect.
That is the difference and a huge one at that.
Same thing with us. Just because something doesn't appear to be right at this moment doesn't mean we should throw out the bible. It just means we need to take a good hard look and see what the problem actually is.
Originally Posted by tCTaco
Originally Posted by seattledave
Originally Posted by tCTaco
all are mind altering.
Crack is cocaine, which is a horrible drug. Do you wanna talk drugs? or do you just follow what you've learned from our just say no media?
Ok... Kahuna just likes to criticize so I'll open it up to all you theists. Ask a question. The Atheists as it has been pointed out have asked plenty where as the theists have not. (maybe since you know everything there is nothing to ask?)
Originally Posted by citizen01
Whoa... This thread got ugly quick. Kahuna, you thought it was soooo funny that your question was supposedly not answered or whatever you said and I challenged you to ask another and you still haven't. Since nothing is coming of the bickering above this post I challenge you to ask a question that the rest of us can run with and change the conversational topic to one that will actually lead somewhere.
I don't see how Dave can continuely refer to what I believe as being Magic and when I call someone out on something, then I've made the thread ugly.
Double Standards can be truly a terrible thing.
Now all that being said I'm still going to stick with my original question, but I will elaborate on it.
Imagine that a Doctor travels to Africa to help the starving and dying children there. While there he sees what is going on and is infuriated so he returns to America with awful tales of baby's dying from starvation.
He tells the stories to a wealthy friend of his that takes the stories to heart and opens a new clinic in Africa to help the children.
So from the death of children a new foundation and clinic is open that saves more lives then the ones that the original doctor saw die.
If this was God's plan all along, is this wrong?
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
Same thing with us. Just because something doesn't appear to be right at this moment doesn't mean we should throw out the bible. It just means we need to take a good hard look and see what the problem actually is.
First there are 76 generations between adam and jesus mean either all pre-homosapien bones that are found are hoaxes, or christians believe adam was a very primitive humanoid, with not much more brain capacity than a great ape who couldn't hardly use tools or speak and through an incredibley fast form of evolution, like 2 generations, we get homosapiens.
then the making of birds before anything that lived on land. In no logical way can me or you explain this. good lord. this just gets worse and worse.
Originally Posted by tCTaco
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
Originally Posted by seattledave
i'm more open minded and enlightened than you or most here, but i attribute most of it to lsd opening my mind though.
So many things just became clear to me....
Wow.
G...I guess Im a dumba$$ for never trying drugs like that.......Damn...I knew I should have smoked that crack back in the day....
But thanks for the new quote for my sig
I was merely shocked to find that you're more enlightened and open minded because you're mind was opened in an instance that can and won't ever be able to be reproduce for another person.
The only reason I bring this up at all is that Christians were put down a few posts back for trying to use personal non-reproducable experiences to demonstrate what they believe.
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
Imagine that a Doctor travels to Africa to help the starving and dying children there. While there he sees what is going on and is infuriated so he returns to America with awful tales of baby's dying from starvation.
He tells the stories to a wealthy friend of his that takes the stories to heart and opens a new clinic in Africa to help the children.
So from the death of children a new foundation and clinic is open that saves more lives then the ones that the original doctor saw die.
If this was God's plan all along, is this wrong?
He tells the stories to a wealthy friend of his that takes the stories to heart and opens a new clinic in Africa to help the children.
So from the death of children a new foundation and clinic is open that saves more lives then the ones that the original doctor saw die.
If this was God's plan all along, is this wrong?
i really don't think this children dying debate is going anywhere. simply put, thuosands more children die than are saved by their death, probably millions more.
LOL... let me get this straight...
God causes children to suffer in africa then sends a doctor to help so that a wealthy man can start a clinic to help the children that god made suffer in the first place...
Well I have to ask why god would make the children suffer in the first place?
God causes children to suffer in africa then sends a doctor to help so that a wealthy man can start a clinic to help the children that god made suffer in the first place...
Well I have to ask why god would make the children suffer in the first place?
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
Originally Posted by citizen01
Whoa... This thread got ugly quick. Kahuna, you thought it was soooo funny that your question was supposedly not answered or whatever you said and I challenged you to ask another and you still haven't. Since nothing is coming of the bickering above this post I challenge you to ask a question that the rest of us can run with and change the conversational topic to one that will actually lead somewhere.
I don't see how Dave can continuely refer to what I believe as being Magic and when I call someone out on something, then I've made the thread ugly.
Double Standards can be truly a terrible thing.
Now all that being said I'm still going to stick with my original question, but I will elaborate on it.
Imagine that a Doctor travels to Africa to help the starving and dying children there. While there he sees what is going on and is infuriated so he returns to America with awful tales of baby's dying from starvation.
He tells the stories to a wealthy friend of his that takes the stories to heart and opens a new clinic in Africa to help the children.
So from the death of children a new foundation and clinic is open that saves more lives then the ones that the original doctor saw die.
If this was God's plan all along, is this wrong?
i kinda ran with this idea earlier, so bear with me.
Most people would think god is all knowing and knows the future.
They also think that they are a result of his creation.
Therefore, he is creating people he knows will suffer, in addition to people he knows will reject him.
So he basically creates people whose sole purpose is to die and people whose sole purpose is to cause suffering and populate hell.
so i dont agree with the suffering of 5 people to justify saving 10 peopple when in terms of a god.
But when talking about the actions of people, i think its ok.
Originally Posted by seattledave
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
Same thing with us. Just because something doesn't appear to be right at this moment doesn't mean we should throw out the bible. It just means we need to take a good hard look and see what the problem actually is.
First there are 76 generations between adam and jesus mean either all pre-homosapien bones that are found are hoaxes, or christians believe adam was a very primitive humanoid, with not much more brain capacity than a great ape who couldn't hardly use tools or speak and through an incredibley fast form of evolution, like 2 generations, we get homosapiens.
then the making of birds before anything that lived on land. In no logical way can me or you explain this. good lord. this just gets worse and worse.
As far as the idea of Adam being a proto-human I'd have to tell you from the point of veiw of an Old-Earther this doesn't have to be. If certain creatures were introduced by God at different times, then Adam was a fully formed human that God had created.
As for the problem with Birds, I can see where you are coming from but I don't understand how you could be taking those verses so literally. If that were the case where would god have made penguins? Or ostriches? They are fowl yet don't fly.
If the bible had gone into detail on when each and every animal was created, no one would ever be able to read it.
Ok... Let's simplify this. If people were "designed" by god...
Why would god give us succeptability to hunger/disease.
Wouldn't a more perfect design be creatures who live for 60 years then die peacefully and are limited to having 2 children? What is the point of god making us suffer (which you must believe he did if you believed he designed us.)
Why would god give us succeptability to hunger/disease.
Wouldn't a more perfect design be creatures who live for 60 years then die peacefully and are limited to having 2 children? What is the point of god making us suffer (which you must believe he did if you believed he designed us.)
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
I was merely shocked to find that you're more enlightened and open minded because you're mind was opened in an instance that can and won't ever be able to be reproduce for another person.
"although of course i don't condone it's use."
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
The only reason I bring this up at all is that Christians were put down a few posts back for trying to use personal non-reproducable experiences to demonstrate what they believe.
Originally Posted by seattledave
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
I was merely shocked to find that you're more enlightened and open minded because you're mind was opened in an instance that can and won't ever be able to be reproduce for another person.
"although of course i don't condone it's use."
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
The only reason I bring this up at all is that Christians were put down a few posts back for trying to use personal non-reproducable experiences to demonstrate what they believe.
Originally Posted by citizen01
Ok... Let's simplify this. If people were "designed" by god...
Why would god give us succeptability to hunger/disease.
Wouldn't a more perfect design be creatures who live for 60 years then die peacefully and are limited to having 2 children? What is the point of god making us suffer (which you must believe he did if you believed he designed us.)
Why would god give us succeptability to hunger/disease.
Wouldn't a more perfect design be creatures who live for 60 years then die peacefully and are limited to having 2 children? What is the point of god making us suffer (which you must believe he did if you believed he designed us.)
Would your example be ok for a creature that at the age of 20 had a horrible experience and decided to end it all and commit suicide?
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
Originally Posted by HeathenBrewing
Originally Posted by krustytheclown
You gotta understand though, An Evolutionist dosen't need to have all the answers and everything is ok. But if a Creationist dosent have all the answers, then that proves that we are wrong.
Evolutionist say that for now, theory 'X' is what we believe, but we can easily drop said theory when it is shown to be incorrect.
That is the difference and a huge one at that.
Same thing with us. Just because something doesn't appear to be right at this moment doesn't mean we should throw out the bible. It just means we need to take a good hard look and see what the problem actually is.
Evolution says - The sun has risen every day for 'X' years. It has risen everyday in my lifetime. But that does not PROVE it will rise tomorrow morning. No one knows for sure.
Creation says - The sun has risen every day for 'X' years. It has risen everyday in my lifetime. I KNOW it will rise tomorrow. The reason I KNOW this is because of FAITH.
As a theist, you can know god because you believe, but you cant believe in god because you know.
Get it? Take a minute on that last sentence and read it again. Understand what it means, not just what it says.
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
As far as the idea of Adam being a proto-human I'd have to tell you from the point of veiw of an Old-Earther this doesn't have to be. If certain creatures were introduced by God at different times, then Adam was a fully formed human that God had created.
(i'm not asking what is right, just asking what you believe is right)
Do you believe Adam was just the first homosapien and homo-erectus became extinct as a seperate species?
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
As for the problem with Birds, I can see where you are coming from but I don't understand how you could be taking those verses so literally. If that were the case where would god have made penguins? Or ostriches? They are fowl yet don't fly.
If the bible had gone into detail on when each and every animal was created, no one would ever be able to read it.
If the bible had gone into detail on when each and every animal was created, no one would ever be able to read it.
you're right about not going into detail on every animal. if it had, we'd not be able to discover new species as we do near everyday. that's why the bible lumped birds all together, because it was not all knowing.
Originally Posted by KahunaBlair
What is your reasoning for people that have "Bad Trips" then they asked to have them?
taking a good amount of lsd the first time, say after being clean from it for a few months or more, it's like being taken for a rollercoaster ride, you have little control of. then with more experience, or taking it <5 days later, you know what's going to happen to your head, and you take the reigns and actually drive.
"I've gone to the sun and back." is something you might say the first time
"I've flown to the sun and back, stopping to visit each planet and check everything out" is something you might say after you got it under control.





