Notices
Photography & Video A place to discuss and display cameras, equipment and photographs.

DSLR Owners Unite! (56k? Are you kidding me?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 12:56 AM
  #16041  
Jasper Ash's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,231
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Default

^ Similar to our 'prime' challenge, no? Most primes can shoot pretty wide.
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 12:59 AM
  #16042  
speedy000's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,645
From: Texas
Default

u dont need to have a huge aperture to get bokeh from lights most kit lens can just zoom as much as it can and shoot f3.5 aslong as the subject and the lights r far apart there will be some bokeh
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 01:03 AM
  #16043  
Jon's Avatar
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,124
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

It's up to you guys. Christmas bokeh challenge is cool with me. Since it was your idea Speedy you can make the thread.
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 01:17 AM
  #16044  
Ethan's Avatar
Senior Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 625
From: Fayetteville, AR
Default

Sounds good. If it stops raining at some point tonight, I'll get started on the challenge.

In the meantime.. I was messing around with my camera just after I unpacked it and shot this. I thought it was cool. But maybe its not. Whatever.

Last edited by Ethan; Dec 7, 2011 at 04:53 PM.
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 01:34 AM
  #16045  
NYNCTC's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Fail, INC
Fresh Crew
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 6,458
From: CYN
Default

Idea behind the photo is great, but I would have had the subject face the camera, light up his face only and do a Assassins Creed style photo
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 01:37 AM
  #16046  
Ethan's Avatar
Senior Member
SL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 625
From: Fayetteville, AR
Default

Ooh, good idea! Thanks for the tip.
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 02:36 AM
  #16047  
speedy000's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,645
From: Texas
Default

THREADS UP :D
Old Dec 4, 2011 | 11:04 PM
  #16048  
gmc_113's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 706
Default





Old Dec 5, 2011 | 12:09 AM
  #16049  
Jasper Ash's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,231
From: West Palm Beach, FL
Default

Still love the Sigma 10-20mm? I might want one for Christmas.
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 12:58 AM
  #16050  
gmc_113's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 706
Default

absofreakinglutely. i really want a fisheye now though
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 02:27 AM
  #16051  
Luc1f3r's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,643
From: Clearwater, FL
Default

theres a Nikon 10.5 for sale in my local CL. only asking $480, i just can't do it with the holidays but its my next lens for sure.
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 03:56 AM
  #16052  
gmc_113's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 706
Default

thats what i want. i paid alil more for my sigma, idk if i can part with my 10-20 i wanna have them both
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 11:41 PM
  #16053  
Luc1f3r's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,643
From: Clearwater, FL
Default

^why? I'm all for zooms and primes but in a wide or fisheye I'm not really seeing the point of a "zoom".

Debate - go.
Old Dec 5, 2011 | 11:54 PM
  #16054  
gmc_113's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 706
Default

the "zoom" in the 10-20 is irrelevant lol i never zoom in i leave it wide all the time
Old Dec 6, 2011 | 12:06 AM
  #16055  
Luc1f3r's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Scikotics
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,643
From: Clearwater, FL
Default

thats how i feel i would use it also. so why have both? lol.
Old Dec 6, 2011 | 12:20 AM
  #16056  
Jon's Avatar
Jon
Moderator
10 Year Member

5 Year Member
SL Member
Moderator
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,124
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

The image from a regular UWA at 10mm is quite different from the image from a 10.5mm (or any other) fisheye.
Old Dec 6, 2011 | 12:39 AM
  #16057  
gmc_113's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 706
Default

^ this
Old Dec 6, 2011 | 12:39 AM
  #16058  
gmc_113's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 706
Default

lol
Old Dec 6, 2011 | 03:57 AM
  #16059  
snowromance's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,192
Default

yea i've often wondered why not just make a 10mm 2.8 that is not fisheye.
Old Dec 6, 2011 | 11:47 PM
  #16060  
snowromance's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,192
Default

the offspring... starting early.


D90 is so huge in front of a 4 year old face lol



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:37 AM.