New 141.1hp xB with supercharger Dyno sheet posted
04-30-2005, 08:28 AM
#81
Senior Member
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Re: PE300
Originally Posted by matchbox
As far as money spent on the PE300. I got it for $1200 overnighted from Cali. Pocket change. I wouldn't have paid the three gs to get this. The SC makes a big difference over stock. The tC is somewhere around 150 lbs heavier than our cars so the 150hp they have is having to make up for the weight difference. I saw a xB with an exhaust and intake on it leave a tC. I have been running this since last fall and have only had one problem with a needle bearing and PE replaced the SC for free. Patrick at PE has been very helpful with everything.
04-30-2005, 08:33 AM
#82
Senior Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vegas
Posts: 464
I've been waivering back and forth between super charger and turbo. But, I've always been a turbo fan and recently have been leaning more toward turbo. But man......for $1200.......I would snag that kit in a minute.
KiL
KiL
04-30-2005, 08:48 AM
#84
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 638
Re: PE300
Originally Posted by hotbox05
Originally Posted by matchbox
As far as money spent on the PE300. I got it for $1200 overnighted from Cali. Pocket change. I wouldn't have paid the three gs to get this. The SC makes a big difference over stock. The tC is somewhere around 150 lbs heavier than our cars so the 150hp they have is having to make up for the weight difference. I saw a xB with an exhaust and intake on it leave a tC. I have been running this since last fall and have only had one problem with a needle bearing and PE replaced the SC for free. Patrick at PE has been very helpful with everything.
Curb wieght of a tC is around 2950 while the xB is 2400. A difference of more than 500lbs.
04-30-2005, 08:38 PM
#86
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 486
Not to ____ on anyones fire here, but my car was slower with the K&N Typhoon than it was stock. It did a best of 16.7 on a GTECH stock, best of 17.2 on a GTECH w/ the K&N Typhoon.
The guy that drove the tC against the intake/exhaust xB must have been drunk. Theres no way an xB with bolt-ons will take a tC with even SEMI equally skilled drivers. I have a friend that ran his 100% STOCK tC 5 speed @ NY Raceway and did 15.55@89mph.
I love my xB, however. I believe in my own heart that it is a much better looking vehicle and I would not trade it for a tC EVER.
As far as my boosted xB vs a stock or bolt-on tC... They can try if they want, but they have not a chance
The guy that drove the tC against the intake/exhaust xB must have been drunk. Theres no way an xB with bolt-ons will take a tC with even SEMI equally skilled drivers. I have a friend that ran his 100% STOCK tC 5 speed @ NY Raceway and did 15.55@89mph.
I love my xB, however. I believe in my own heart that it is a much better looking vehicle and I would not trade it for a tC EVER.
As far as my boosted xB vs a stock or bolt-on tC... They can try if they want, but they have not a chance
05-05-2005, 07:39 PM
#88
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 179
Ok, so how about a 1/4 mile time. I ran a 16.26 in the 1/8 on stock tires, with just an injen short ram intake. I'd like to think spending 3 large on a super charger would reduce that time. Are you an automatic? With my 19's on I had crazy wheel hop and ran a 10.6. Stock tires hopped a little but I got a much better 60ft time. I haven't ran it in the 1/4 mile yet, waiting on a few more items before I go back to racing it.
05-06-2005, 08:31 AM
#89
Senior Member
SL Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cape Coral, Florida
Posts: 2,114
Originally Posted by fachiro1
That is totally cool! It has got to be the ultimate performance mod for the xb. Any 0-60 times?
unless you're talking about 0-60 foot times, then I'd guess 2.3-2.6, but that's just a guess.
turn the car around and take it out of reverse.
05-06-2005, 10:35 AM
#92
Senior Member
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Originally Posted by jdaniels
Not to ____ on anyones fire here, but my car was slower with the K&N Typhoon than it was stock. It did a best of 16.7 on a GTECH stock, best of 17.2 on a GTECH w/ the K&N Typhoon.
The guy that drove the tC against the intake/exhaust xB must have been drunk. Theres no way an xB with bolt-ons will take a tC with even SEMI equally skilled drivers. I have a friend that ran his 100% STOCK tC 5 speed @ NY Raceway and did 15.55@89mph.
I love my xB, however. I believe in my own heart that it is a much better looking vehicle and I would not trade it for a tC EVER.
As far as my boosted xB vs a stock or bolt-on tC... They can try if they want, but they have not a chance
The guy that drove the tC against the intake/exhaust xB must have been drunk. Theres no way an xB with bolt-ons will take a tC with even SEMI equally skilled drivers. I have a friend that ran his 100% STOCK tC 5 speed @ NY Raceway and did 15.55@89mph.
I love my xB, however. I believe in my own heart that it is a much better looking vehicle and I would not trade it for a tC EVER.
As far as my boosted xB vs a stock or bolt-on tC... They can try if they want, but they have not a chance
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rain7905643
PPC: Engine / Drivetrain
3
06-13-2018 05:29 AM
060, 08, 1nz, 2004, challenger, civic, dyno, procharger, scion, sheets, si, srt8, supercharged, supercharger, xb
