Notices
Scion xA Owners Lounge
2004-2006.5 [NCP61]

If Scion decides to have a 2nd gen xA this should be the one

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2004, 10:07 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
dante_b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 177
Default

point of this thread is......toyota sucks scion's toes hehe lets just wait and see what happens, till then happy tuning!
dante_b is offline  
Old 12-11-2004, 03:13 PM
  #42  
jct
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
 
jct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 13,963
Default

DAMN THATS A NICE CAR
jct is offline  
Old 12-11-2004, 05:32 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Scion Evolution
 
fugeelama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 340
Default

Originally Posted by Corbic
Ok, answer this. Why does Toyota sell the Vitz, Ist and BB in Japan? They all basicly overlap, just like a Echo, xA and xB would here.
You can't bring the xb/BB into the discussion because even though they share the same platform, they're different body styles. All Scions are technically hatchbacks of some form... The Ist and xA are almost identical twins; the Vitz is a slightly different car though, and it shows with the fact that this car (see start of thread, a.k.a. the Echo2) has evolved into something else.

As for the Japanese market having multiple versions of cars, what works for Japan doesn't always work for the US. Could you imagine buyers here in the States having to try and decide between a Scion xA, Toyota Vitz, Toyota Echo, Scion Ist... you get the picture.

We can keep going with this forever. The bottom line (ie: my final statement) is that IMO it doesn't make any real sense to have a Scion xA and a Toyota Echo2 sold on the same lot. Reasons have been stated, so it's just a matter of time before the official word comes out as to what's really going to happen.
fugeelama is offline  
Old 12-11-2004, 06:39 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
SL Member
Thread Starter
 
Rich_Manas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 446
Default

$20 says there will be an Echo replacement. As for the Celica and tC, Cellica is getting kicked out because of faily sales, which have been happening since 2000, not since the tC came out. Its also rummored the Celcia will just reappear as a Scion.
we never said that they wouldn't bring an echo replacement. what were saying is that it would be stupid of them to bring out a sub-compact hatch that's similar in price, size and looks of an xA.

yes, celica sales have been been very poor after 2000 when the car was released but that's how sports coupes sales are normally. they're always good when the car is released but after a year it slows down. if you want to see for yourself go to a madza or nissan dealer and look at the 350 and rx8. there used to be a waiting period, now you can drive one off the lot.

How does it not make sence to have simliar cars? It offers diveristy at almost no additional cost (same platforms, same parts, just different body pannels). In Japan they seem to have no problem offering the Vitz, Ist and BB, so why would they have a problem will all three here? Mitsubishi off the top of my head offers the FTO and the Eclipse, which are simliar? Why offer a Avalon and a GS300? Why offer a Highlander and a LX-470? Same truck, same car basicly, just marketed toward different people with different tates.
japan is a different market than america. america is bigger market, its all about volume which took the japanese awhile to realize that it would be easier to build certain high volume cars here. fto and eclipse similar? the only thing they share is that they're both built by mitsu, but again we don't get the fto. why? cause they feel its not neccessary to have two coupes in their line up. avalon and gs300? last i checked the avalon was front wheel drive and the gs rear wheel drive. one cost $10 to $15k more than the other. how is that the same? even if they were the same which they're not, they are not sold under the same roof. highlander and RX330 not lx470. again, sold under two different dealers. the so called replacement for the echo will be in the same building as the xA.


Why offer a RSX and a SI, same car, both two door hatches. Why offer an Accord and a TL? Murano and a FX? Same SUV? Magnum and 300C, both sell like hot cakes. Passat and A4? Beetle and Golf? Identical cars infact which compete for the same shopper. The list goes on forever.
again your missing the point. all the cars you mentioned above are either sold at a different dealer (ie: acura or infiniti dealer vs honda or nissan dealer) or the two cars look somewhat different. no ones going to look at a golf and a beetle and say they both look the same.

i'm sorry but how old are you?
Rich_Manas is offline  
Old 12-13-2004, 02:35 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
10 Year Member
5 Year Member
Team Sushi
SL Member
Team N.V.S.
Scion Evolution
 
djct_watt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
Posts: 4,322
Default

for those that didn't know, the echo is the worst selling Toyota vehicle, relative to sales goals (MR2 is low volume, and although the actual sales are less, the sales to goal ratio is larger, on average). I don't see any reason for Toyota to continue selling such a miserable product.
djct_watt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2CTC
Scion tC 2G Owners Lounge
14
09-12-2015 11:33 AM
posiden
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Suspension & Handling
2
03-22-2015 03:03 AM
Ramroids55
Scion tC 1G Owners Lounge
17
01-16-2015 02:42 PM
kleecker
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Wheel & Tire
12
12-31-2014 04:07 PM
kleecker
Scion xB 2nd-Gen Suspension & Handling
5
12-31-2014 09:42 AM



Quick Reply: If Scion decides to have a 2nd gen xA this should be the one



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 AM.